Re: CRASH CONTAGION

From: Kenneth Van Oost (Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be)
Date: Sun Jan 20 2002 - 14:40:46 GMT

  • Next message: Grant Callaghan: "Re: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id OAA09334 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 20 Jan 2002 14:38:44 GMT
    Message-ID: <003201c1a1c0$88b153c0$5b9ebed4@default>
    From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
    To: <kennethvanoost@myrealbox.com>
    References: <00f301c1a1b5$f2180ee0$0b00a8c0@anneea767tmswx>
    Subject: Re: CRASH CONTAGION
    Date: Sun, 20 Jan 2002 15:40:46 +0100
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
    X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: tazzie <tazzie@bolian.upnaway.com>

    Kenneth wrote,
    > Is the US media to blame for the fact that the man mudered his 5 children
    !?
    > This is a holistic view, a butterfly in the Amazone area can produce a
    storm
    > in Denmark....
    > IMO, the media only works as a catalyst.
    > Not showing, giving no comments equals a loss in income and viewer-
    > rates. It is hard competitive world ! -
    > _____________________________________________________
     Hi Anne,
    > IMHO the media does not work as a catalyst, (my known definition of a
    > catalyst is something that *causes* a event to happen) it may contribute
    but
    > does not cause the event!

    << That is the way I see the role for the media ! But to what extend the
    media does contribute is yet to be seen. The Holland- example show that
    the influence of the media is greater than we all believe, but the ' how '
    of
    that influence is yet unknown. IMO, I think that for each of us there is a
    seperate set of pathways out there that will trigger us into committing
    suicide, but to which extend that sensibility is THE trigger that you or I
    will commit suicide is open to debate.

    > The person ending their life, is at the end of the day, responsible for
    > her/his actions,,

    << Yes and no ! If you were to be a 14 years old schoolgirl raised in an
    extreme catholic environment where praying, sin and belief are the corner-
    stones of your existence, and where boys, sex and playing truant were
    your parents worst nightmare, at the end of the day your responsibility can
    be lifted if you were to ran under a train, after an uncle have been seeing
    you talking to a boy during class- hours !!

    (This is an event that really happened.)
    The girl ran under a train after an uncle spotted her outside the school
    talking to a unknown boy. In pure and simple panic she ran away.
    Knowing her life was over, she tried to commit suicide. ' Unfortunaly ',
    she failed... ( she is now living, far away from her family, ( who abandoned
    her) _ seeing boys, playing truant, trying to kill yourself,... even in the
    best families that is asking too mush ).

    > The media has real bad integrity but as for suicide, society in general
    > has a lot to answer for.. I bet out of 95% of suicides most family and
    > friends did not see much idication of the event about to happen and yet if
    > they did a simple conversation might have prevented the tragic event!

    << I agree with the fact that society has a lot to answer for ( see above),
    but friends and family don 't see at all what is bound to happen, though !
    Anne, a simple conversation can help in cases where the notion about
    committing suicide is in a very basic phase, what lies beyond such facts
    is in most cases undetectable.

    Suicide, they say is related to depression, but in cases wherein children
    are concerned, committing suicide is no option.
    A view on this is the following ( accordingly C. Marneffe, director of
    the Les Clairs Vallons- institute), depression is positive in therapy. It
    means
    that those children are in contact with their inner- self. Children fight
    depression by acting difficult. Teaching them ( and their parents) to cope
    with this helps.
    _ In a way, taking the ' child ' out of the kid is no way to teach your
    child(ren) responsibility. Giving them everything without any reason
    for it, is no way giving sense to the childs life...

    Regards,

    Kenneth

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 20 2002 - 14:53:21 GMT