RE: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception

From: Joe Dees (joedees@addall.com)
Date: Sun Jan 20 2002 - 04:41:19 GMT

  • Next message: Joe Dees: "Ben's Confusing Example"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id EAA08206 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 20 Jan 2002 04:45:44 GMT
    Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 20:41:19 -0800
    Message-Id: <200201200441.g0K4fJG14077@mail9.bigmailbox.com>
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Content-Disposition: inline
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
    X-Mailer: MIME-tools 4.104 (Entity 4.116)
    X-Originating-Ip: [65.80.162.26]
    From: "Joe Dees" <joedees@addall.com>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: RE: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is)

    > "Lawrence DeBivort" <debivort@umd5.umd.edu> <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> RE: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory PerceptionDate: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 09:52:58 -0500
    >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >
    >Joe, thanks for the citations you sent in another message today, and will
    >comment later on what I find there.
    >
    >Meanwhile: Israelis and anti-Israeli Arabs share an unfortunate saying:
    >
    >"The enemy of my enemy is my friend."
    >
    >The reason that this is unfortunate is that it 1) obscures the reality that
    >in a conflict may be many parties each with different objectives and
    >methods, 2) leads to promiscuous alliances and endorsements, the darker side
    >of an "ally's history and belief system then rubbing off on all who become
    >allied.
    >
    >Further, generalization then steps in and blinds protagonists to necessary
    >distinctions: for many Israelis, ALL Arabs are out to get them, or ALL
    >Muslims; for many Palestinians, ALL Israelis are out to get them, or ALL
    >Jews, and especially American Jews, with whom they associate US policies in
    >the Middle East. These are all toxic memes, in that they lead to
    >self-defeating behaviors on all parts. They lead to some Israelis seeking
    >solace with American Christian and Jewish religious fundamentalists, or with
    >South Africa's Apartheid regimes. They lead some anti-Israeli Muslims to
    >seek solace with anti-Jewish/semites. And in receiving that solace, both are
    >encouraged to ignore the real work of reconciliation that must take place if
    >the killing is to stop.
    >
    >I would guess that the percentage of anti-Israeli Arabs who are in contact
    >with American skinheads is extremely small, in the same way that not only
    >are American skinheads a very small portion of the US population, but beyond
    >that the proportion of American skinheads in anything like a dialog with
    >Arab/Muslim terrorists is extremely small. Your observations, IMO, imply an
    >great exaggeration of this phenomenon, distasteful as it is.
    >
    >Lawrence
    >
    I think that as long as exclusivist patriarchal monotheisms that are manipulable by fanatics (largely on the basis of what is indeed written in their holy books) to inspire holy murder inhere in this world and command power over the affairs of nations and sway over the minds of the fundamentalist faithful, we will be stuck with a bloody memetic problem.
    >
    >
    >> -----Original Message-----
    >> From: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk [mailto:fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk]On Behalf
    >> Of Joe Dees
    >> Sent: Saturday, January 19, 2002 1:56 AM
    >> To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >> Subject: RE: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >>
    >> > "Lawrence DeBivort" <debivort@umd5.umd.edu>
    >> <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> RE: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory
    >> PerceptionDate: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 15:51:35 -0500
    >> >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >> >
    >> >Much as I would like to agree with you, Douglas, the Bush
    >> administration was
    >> >not suggesting in their new assessment of what really threatens
    >> the US that
    >> >the threat of low-grade terrorism came from internal sources.
    >> Their recent
    >> >concession that truck/boat-borne explosives are more of a threat than
    >> >missiles referred still to external sources of terrorist threats.
    >> >
    >> >I don't follow the shenanigans of the US domestic
    >> >fundamentalists/survivalists etc much, and am not aware of how they are
    >> >evolving. Can you summarize things here?
    >> >
    >> Actually, Islamic terrorists and our homegrown neo-nazi types
    >> have been talking to each other on the Internet. They share a
    >> hatred for democracy and Jews, and a fondness for Adolph Hitler
    >> and his policies.
    >> >
    >> >I think we can build a generic model of terrorism and its accompanying
    >> >dynamics, and that we would find domestic and foreign terrorists to be
    >> >pretty similar. We do have also to remember that not all terrorism comes
    >> >from religious fundamentalist sources, e.g. Bader-Meinhoff (sp?)
    >> would have
    >> >to be seen as a 'modernist' terrorist group.
    >> >
    >> >If we could build such a model, we could have an interesting
    >> memetic overlay
    >> >for it.....
    >> >
    >> >Lawrence
    >> >
    >> >
    >> >
    >> >> -----Original Message-----
    >> >> From: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk [mailto:fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk]On Behalf
    >> >> Of Douglas Brooker
    >> >> Sent: Friday, January 18, 2002 5:21 AM
    >> >> To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >> >> Subject: RE: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception
    >> >>
    >> >>
    >> >>
    >> >> > >Hands up who thinks Richard's views here have any credence
    >> >> whatsoever?
    >> >> > >Notice the way he uses the term 'we' as though he was personally
    >> >> engaged in
    >> >> > >the destruction of Afghanistan.
    >> >>
    >> >> well, this is how Americans talk. Maybe it could be called the Johnny
    >> >> Carson syndrome (cf: The King of Comedy)
    >> >>
    >> >> > >> <<Also, in the category of the Bush administration calming down
    >> >> and coming
    >> >> > >> to
    >> >> > >> its senses, it has now conceded that missile attacks from 'rogue
    >> >> states'
    >> >> > >> are
    >> >> > >> not the greatest military danger to the US, but that low-grade
    >> >> terrorist
    >> >> > >> attacks (e.g. trucks a la Oklahoma city) are.
    >> >>
    >> >> I think this is very intelligent. It recognises the biggest terrorist
    >> >> threat to the US is from within, from anonymous disaffected citizens
    >> >> who will strike at random.
    >> >>
    >
    >
    >===============================================================
    >This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    >Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    >For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    >see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    ------------------------------------------------------------
    Looking for a book? Want a deal? No problem AddALL!
    http://www.addall.com compares book price at 41 online stores.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Jan 20 2002 - 05:17:25 GMT