Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id QAA07007 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 19 Jan 2002 16:57:16 GMT Message-Id: <200201191652.g0JGqmB09123@terri.harvard.edu> Subject: Re: The necessity of mental memes Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 11:52:52 -0500 x-sender: wsmith1@camail.harvard.edu x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T. Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu> To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Hi Joe Dees -
>perception and action matter completely in your model, and cognition not
>at all
Interesting. Not that I deny cognition, of course, but, I just don't see
anything _internally_ memetic about it. I give to cognition what is
cognition's.
And, my model doesn't deny cognition- it makes it one of three players,
with perception and action, of memetic behavior.
Hawking might be one of those accidental fortunately unfortunate cases. I
don't know enough about his physical condition to go on. But, I was under
the impression his perceptions of eyesight and hearing were not hampered,
and that the degeneration of his body was not natal, in that he developed
fully as far as language and intellect were concerned before his
condition manifested. But, I don't know. Like feral children, people with
afflictions are unhappy accidents who can help studies of cognition and
learning.
And, again, compensations.
- Wade
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 19 2002 - 17:19:21 GMT