Re: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception

From: Wade T. Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Sat Jan 19 2002 - 16:23:56 GMT

  • Next message: Wade T. Smith: "Re: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id QAA06855 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 19 Jan 2002 16:28:14 GMT
Message-Id: <200201191623.g0JGNpB07870@terri.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception
Date: Sat, 19 Jan 2002 11:23:56 -0500
x-sender: wsmith1@camail.harvard.edu
x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
From: "Wade T. Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    Hi Joe Dees -

    >In either case, observations are possible; in neither case is validity
    >assured.

    Well, the _possible_ observation is a _valid_ observation. I didn't say
    it had to be an observation of validity or in validity....

    But, in the case of internal memes, it's always been a case of wishful
    thinking.

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 19 2002 - 16:39:40 GMT