RE: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception

From: Joe Dees (joedees@addall.com)
Date: Sat Jan 19 2002 - 07:43:18 GMT

  • Next message: Joe Dees: "Re: Do all memes die out or evolve? I think not."

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id HAA05761 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 19 Jan 2002 07:47:42 GMT
    Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 23:43:18 -0800
    Message-Id: <200201190743.g0J7hIK20660@mail2.bigmailbox.com>
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Content-Disposition: inline
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
    X-Mailer: MIME-tools 4.104 (Entity 4.116)
    X-Originating-Ip: [65.80.162.155]
    From: "Joe Dees" <joedees@addall.com>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: RE: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is)

    > "Grant Callaghan" <grantc4@hotmail.com> memetics@mmu.ac.uk RE: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory PerceptionDate: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 07:28:09 -0800
    >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >
    >>
    >> > Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk> "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'"
    >><memetics@mmu.ac.uk> RE: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory PerceptionDate: Thu,
    >>17 Jan 2002 15:10:28 -0000
    >> >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >> >
    >> >Hi Joe, how do you define 'credible source'? US military? US media?
    >> >Foreign media? Aid agencies? Who do you believe?
    >> >
    >> >US media have closed themselves down, the allied military have closed off
    >> >Afghanistan, and basically none of us outside of the situation on the
    >>ground
    >> >know jack about what's really going on. Real factual information about
    >> >what's going on there is in short supply.
    >> >
    >> >I will gladly, however, bet you anything you like that the death toll in
    >> >Afghanistan is already greater than in New York.
    >> >
    >> >Vincent
    >> >
    >>I sure as hell hope it is vastly greater, if that death toll is comprised
    >>of Al Quaeda and Taliban. We don't want those zealous fanatical fundie
    >>bastards coming over here and mass murdering more of us to punch tickets to
    >>heaven if we can help it, thankyouverymuch!!!!!
    >> >
    >> >> >If the US does not believe that its might is evidence of its goodness,
    >> >> how
    >> >> >does it justify its aggression and the collateral damage (way in exes
    >>of
    >> >> >9/11) caused thereby. How many innocent lives does vengeance (tho your
    >> >> God
    >> >> >claims that right) demand
    >> >> >
    >> > <You need to reference your opinion with facts. as of now, the
    >> >death toll from the WTC atrocity is 2939; no credible source dares claim
    >> >that an equal or greater number of Afghan noncombatants have died in the
    >>US
    >> >reponse against the Taliban and Al Quaeda there.>
    >> >> >
    >"Credible sources" in the United States started claiming losses in the WTC
    >of 6,000. It took 3 months to pare it down to less than 3,000. No one's
    >really counting the losses in Afghanistan nor are they separating the cause
    >of deaths that include starvation, sickness, attacks by the Taliban, attacks
    >by the Northern Alliance, and bombs dropped by American forces. We will no
    >doubt hear bandied about figures that include all of the above as deaths
    >caused by American forces. There was a lot of that in discussions of
    >Somalia. Let's face it, the only place where anyone is making anything
    >close to a rational assessment of how many died and of what is in the U.S.
    >And even those figures have been changing on a daily basis for the last few
    >months. So when people start throwing figures around to "prove" their
    >point, make sure you take them for what they are worth: diddly.
    >
    >Grant
    >
    And people conveniently forget that before 9/11, the US was the single largest (by a wide margin) provider of food aid to Afghanistan, and that this has not just continued, but accelerated. And that the country had a pre-9/11 infant (pre-5 years old) death rate of 25%, due to the restrictions that the Taliban placed upon the ability of Afghan women to receive prenatal care and to work to feed their children, and that agenda-ed individuals will lump every one of those (even reduced statistically) child deaths at the feet of the US.
    >_________________________________________________________________
    >Send and receive Hotmail on your mobile device: http://mobile.msn.com
    >
    >
    >===============================================================
    >This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    >Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    >For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    >see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    ------------------------------------------------------------
    Looking for a book? Want a deal? No problem AddALL!
    http://www.addall.com compares book price at 41 online stores.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Jan 19 2002 - 08:56:58 GMT