Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id WAA04610 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 18 Jan 2002 22:48:09 GMT Message-Id: <200201182243.g0IMhZS00578@sherri.harvard.edu> Subject: Re: Sensory and sensibility and a big question Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 17:43:38 -0500 x-sender: wsmith1@camail.harvard.edu x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T. Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu> To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Hi Francesca S. Alcorn -
>But it has occurred naturally.
Well, again, I never offered that it didn't, or might not, but that, if 
conducted experimentally, with knowledge, (as an ultimate experiment in 
memetics) it would be horrific....
Anyway, although inconclusive as regards memetics, I think we can say 
that memes, if acquired at all in the human, are developmental, and tied 
to language-
http://www.ling.lancs.ac.uk/monkey/ihe/linguistics/LECTURE4/4ferconc.htm
"Feral children: conclusions
Candland points out that "genetic" should not be considered to be the 
opposite of "experience" and that the elimination of one does not imply 
the presence or importance of another. It is impossible to say that our 
development consists of x% innate ability and y% that is learned, and we 
should not imply a reciprocal relationship between the two, when it does 
not exist. For Candland, a more important issue is what can be learned at 
what age? Perhaps certain mental aspects can be learned at one age under 
certain circumstances, but at later ages or under inappropriate 
conditions learning is impossible, or greatly impaired. The lack of early 
education of the feral children could mean that they could never learn. 
It is difficult to draw conclusions from studies on feral children; each 
case was very different - the background of the feral child, the goals of 
the experimenter and the method of teaching all have to be taken into 
account. Of the five children, Kaspar Hauser appeared to be the most 
successful in learning how to talk, but Kaspar had not been raised in the 
wild. The early experiences of children greatly influenced their capacity 
to learn at a later date.
In any case, if feral children had difficulty in learning to talk, it is 
not surprising that experiments on teaching chimps to acquire language 
were not entirely successful either."
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 18 2002 - 23:42:01 GMT