Re: sensory and sensibility

From: salice@gmx.net
Date: Fri Jan 18 2002 - 18:00:03 GMT

Next message: Keith Henson: "Re: Scientology 3/4"

Previous message: Joachim Maier: "Re: Sensory and sensibility and a big question"
In reply to: Francesca S. Alcorn: "sensory and sensibility"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA03543 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 18 Jan 2002 18:06:25 GMT
From: <salice@gmx.net>
To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Date: Fri, 18 Jan 2002 19:00:03 +0100
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: sensory and sensibility
Message-ID: <3C4870B3.5011.27B2B1@localhost>
In-reply-to: <p04320401b86decd53d08@[192.168.2.3]>
References: <200201180711.g0I7Biq28424@mail17.bigmailbox.com>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

> It implies that we have abstracted certain qualities about an object,
> and have an internal representation of such. Seems like it might be
> a start.

Wasn't platon already thinking about this? I can remember the
example of the horses being all different from each other but we
can all identify them as horses.

===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

Next message: Keith Henson: "Re: Scientology 3/4"
Previous message: Joachim Maier: "Re: Sensory and sensibility and a big question"
In reply to: Francesca S. Alcorn: "sensory and sensibility"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 18 2002 - 21:15:44 GMT