Re: Why memeoids?

From: Wade Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Thu Jan 17 2002 - 21:03:42 GMT

  • Next message: Douglas Brooker: "Re: Blaming"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id VAA00477 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 17 Jan 2002 21:08:22 GMT
    Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 16:03:42 -0500
    Subject: Re: Why memeoids?
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
    From: Wade Smith <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    In-Reply-To: <5.1.0.14.0.20020117144516.02c41d00@pop.cogeco.ca>
    Message-Id: <B01F32F3-0B8D-11D6-906F-003065A0F24C@harvard.edu>
    X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.480)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Thursday, January 17, 2002, at 03:40 , Keith Henson wrote:

    > I am not sure that fully understanding the biological roots of
    > the problem will lead to solutions either, but it does seem
    > like the best long range approach available.

    I believe this is why criminal investigation has turned to
    profiling, among other things.

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 17 2002 - 21:35:16 GMT