Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA28690 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 17 Jan 2002 12:26:37 GMT Message-Id: <200201171222.g0HCMCS17453@sherri.harvard.edu> Subject: Re: Knowledge, Memes and Sensory Perception Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2002 07:22:14 -0500 x-sender: wsmith1@camail.harvard.edu x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T. Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu> To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Hi Philip Jonkers -
>Written
>language increases copying-fidelity.
Yup, and as long as the cultural context is intact, meaning fidelity is
also maintained.
>It may
>even be anticipated that communication
>between AI computers (program exchange) yields
>even higher copying fidelity.
For what it's worth, it ain't anticipation- digital exchange is highly
accurate. Has to be. There are even error-correcting and checking systems
built-in. If only we were so equipped.
But, if AI computers all had different languages, and no built-in
translation systems, and only five senses to know things with, then....
- Wade
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 17 2002 - 12:48:57 GMT