RE: Modes of transmission

From: Wade T. Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Thu Jan 17 2002 - 04:39:24 GMT

  • Next message: Keith Henson: "Re: Scientology" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id EAA27915 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 17 Jan 2002 04:43:50 GMT
Message-Id: <200201170439.g0H4dMB19809@terri.harvard.edu>
Subject: RE: Modes of transmission
Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 23:39:24 -0500
x-sender: wsmith1@camail.harvard.edu
x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
From: "Wade T. Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    Hi Joe Dees -

    >>And all of art would range over all.
    >>
    >Seems provisionally reasonable, but requires much elaboration.

    I just don't think art has any limits as to means of expression. Take the
    theatre- words, behavior, scenery, music, kinetic sculpture, you name it.
    The theatre is a living laboratory of modes of transmission. But I did
    say all of art. All of anything doesn't require much elaboration....

    How about a modes of transmission analysis of the Blue Man Group? Since
    they're shills now, should be right up someone's alley.

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jan 17 2002 - 04:53:36 GMT