RE: Has anybody read this book?

From: Price, Ilfryn (I.Price@shu.ac.uk)
Date: Wed Jan 16 2002 - 16:16:49 GMT

  • Next message: salice@gmx.net: "Re: Do all memes die out or evolve? I think not."

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id QAA25761 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 16 Jan 2002 16:21:10 GMT
    Message-ID: <C4C20D0AEF0BF84B90CFEA0105EEB0BD29AD73@selene.shu.ac.uk>
    From: "Price, Ilfryn" <I.Price@shu.ac.uk>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Has anybody read this book?
    Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2002 16:16:49 -0000
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19)
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    > From: Keith Henson [mailto:hkhenson@cogeco.ca]
    > Sent: 16 January 2002 14:49
    > Memes and genes have been co-evolving for long enough for our
    > genes to
    > become fully dependant on the meme class that helps stabilize
    > our mental
    > systems against the negative effect of being able to
    > anticipate the future
    > and worry about it. The ability to anticipate has high
    > survival value, of
    > being able to plant in anticipation of a harvest, to store up
    > firewood for
    > winter, and to move with the seasons to take advantage of
    > seasonal resources.

    Unless we grant, say squirrels or swallows, with a high susceptibility to religion we must assume some at least of the anticipation is
    genetic. Firewood could be a 'Maybe' but we would have to assume harvests are memetic, so much of your thesis may only for 8,000 years odd
    (difficult perhaps for genes but not necessarily impossible)
     
    > But this ability comes with problems. Once you have it, it is nearly
    > impossible to avoid applying it to your own future--leading
    > to time and
    > energy wasting worry about a problem (death) our ancestors
    > could do nothing
    > about. Enter the religious memes which provide "answers" to the
    > unanswerable, comfort to the grief stricken, and let the
    > genes get on with
    > replicating (I.e., taking care of the kids).

    The religous memes also provide 'comfort' to the 90++% of post agrarian revolution populations compelled to see their economic surplus
    devoted to building wealth and monuments for others, including many religous or religous / military power structures.

    > Do this long enough, give it enough of an advantage, and you
    > get genes
    > building a place in the brain to accept religious class
    > memes. If you dig
    > about in the literature the location (temporal lobe) is
    > known. Seizures in
    > this area are connected to extreme religious feelings and
    > (for unknown
    > reasons) to "hypergraphia," writing incessantly.
    >
    > http://pub63.ezboard.com/ftheologyfortodayfrm14.showMessage?to
    picID=86.topic

    Given limits to upward mobility of genetic exchange perhaps those with a propensity to accept the status quo just lived long enough to breed
    at all. The rest got burnt / crucified / enslaved or whatever. Writing as you say is a puzzler.

    >It's a patch, but evolution is like that, patch upon patch.

    Its also - as is my version - a just so story. Interesting to test it. I'm not sure whether the variables could be eliminated.

    If Price

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 16 2002 - 16:37:30 GMT