Re: CRASH CONTAGION

From: Paul Marsden (paulsmarsden@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Jan 11 2002 - 18:41:34 GMT

  • Next message: Grant Callaghan: "Re: To Grant - a man of many assumptions" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA11277 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 11 Jan 2002 18:46:36 GMT
X-Originating-IP: [217.34.82.174]
From: "Paul Marsden" <paulsmarsden@hotmail.com>
To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: CRASH CONTAGION
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 18:41:34 -0000
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0007_01C19ACF.98561290"
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2600.0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
Message-ID: <LAW2-OE15ivR0wzGDCv00007e2d@hotmail.com>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 11 Jan 2002 18:41:51.0003 (UTC) FILETIME=[A201F6B0:01C19ACF]
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

    >IMHO Vincent is correct when he
    >concludes that experiments showing disinhibition due to media is
    >bogus research.

    I must have a bogus PhD then - I'm not sure Vincent said that experiments showing disinhibition due to media is bogus research - but what, in your opinion would constitute non-bogus research into this putative phenomenon?

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Jan 11 2002 - 19:27:32 GMT