RE: playing at suicide

From: Richard Brodie (richard@brodietech.com)
Date: Wed Jan 09 2002 - 21:15:36 GMT

  • Next message: Wade Smith: "Re: playing at suicide" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id VAA05791 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 9 Jan 2002 21:19:58 GMT
From: "Richard Brodie" <richard@brodietech.com>
To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Subject: RE: playing at suicide
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2002 13:15:36 -0800
Message-ID: <JJEIIFOCALCJKOFDFAHBEEINEBAA.richard@brodietech.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000
In-Reply-To: <LAW2-F95OhAFUb5aSoI000196f9@hotmail.com>
Importance: Normal
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    <<See previous posts on Grant's theory of memes.>>

    But by MY theory, a "Grant" is an overripe banana. Why would I want to read
    a theory on knock-down, drag-out arguments from an overripe banana? I'm just
    getting more and more confused.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jan 09 2002 - 21:26:39 GMT