Fw: playing at suicide

From: Kenneth Van Oost (Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be)
Date: Tue Jan 08 2002 - 18:16:01 GMT

  • Next message: Dace: "Re: Wade's hammer"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA02972 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 8 Jan 2002 18:15:24 GMT
    Message-ID: <000e01c19870$bb47f9a0$9fa4bed4@default>
    From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
    To: "memetics" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: Fw: playing at suicide
    Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 19:16:01 +0100
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    >
    >
    > >
    > > ----- Original Message -----
    > > From: Grant Callaghan <grantc4@hotmail.com>
    > > I feel sorry for the
    > > > children who followed their instincts to their deaths, but I don't
    > really
    > > > see any deep psychological underpinning for it. To me it looks a lot
    > like
    > > > what happens when a child dashes in front of a car or falls into a
    > > swimming
    > > > pool and drowns -- an unfortunate accident. We can't child-proof the
    > > world
    > > > to avoid them.
    > >
    > > Hi Grant,
    > >
    > > I feel sorry too ! My understanding of the facts are quite the same
    except
    > > for not seeing any deep psychological underpinning for it.
    > > I stand convinced of the fact that in many cultures children were not to
    > be
    > > harmed, more for moral and ethical reasons than for the being of the kid
    > > itself. In a sense we, the eldery/ the parents always discharge children
    > > from
    > > any responsibility. We are trying to make the world child- proof in a
    very
    > > extreme way...
    > > It is my view that ( Lamarckian) memetic inheritance, that is,
    inheritance
    > > of thoughts, insights, opinions,... are part of the puzzle !
    > > It all boils down to the point that the concept of natural selection is
    > just
    > > another favorable mutation in extremis chosen by a particular memetic
    > > mindset.
    > >
    > > Moreover, there is nothing wrong with the view that even certain or par-
    > > ticular behavioral traits of which we think they are promoted by natural
    > > selection are in fact already ' chosen mutations '. Investigators would
    > see
    > > those as outcomes of a Darwinian natural selection process where in fact
    > > a Lamarckian one holds the key.
    > > It is my suggestion that memecomplexes/ brainstructures may have
    > > mechanisms fo choosing which memes suits best.
    > >
    > > Thanks for the link,
    > >
    > > Regards,
    > >
    > > Kenneth
    > >
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 08 2002 - 18:28:34 GMT