RE: CRASH CONTAGION

From: Wade T. Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Tue Jan 08 2002 - 12:07:00 GMT

  • Next message: Wade T. Smith: "Re: Wade's hammer" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA02325 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 8 Jan 2002 12:11:26 GMT
Message-Id: <200201081206.g08C6uB05987@terri.harvard.edu>
Subject: RE: CRASH CONTAGION
Date: Tue, 8 Jan 2002 07:07:00 -0500
x-sender: wsmith1@camail.harvard.edu
x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
From: "Wade T. Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    Hi Keith Henson -

    >They would be far better off
    >putting the effort on men and mostly young men at that. You could even
    >ignore young guys with a wife or girlfriend and certainly any with their
    >children with them.

    Sounds like the auto insurance companies' ratings, based on actual
    accident statistics.

    There is way too much of the 'boys will be boys' thing around.

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jan 08 2002 - 12:29:38 GMT