Re: CRASH CONTAGION

From: Kenneth Van Oost (Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be)
Date: Mon Jan 07 2002 - 18:48:23 GMT

  • Next message: Paul Marsden: "Re: CRASH CONTAGION"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id SAA00820 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 7 Jan 2002 18:46:50 GMT
    Message-ID: <002c01c197ab$f92f1a20$c8a4bed4@default>
    From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    References: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3102A6D1BC@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    Subject: Re: CRASH CONTAGION
    Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 19:48:23 +0100
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>

    > With Phillips-like research, in which such views are rooted, the 100%
    > increase in people flying a plane into a building deliberately would be
    > proof of cause and effect, but I see no evidence of this. Paul predicted
    > such copy-cat attempts pretty soon after the original attack, but several
    > months on there has been this one case. How long does media coverage
    > resonate with audiences with contagious effect? In other words what is
    the
    > period in which such contagions remain powerful? Is it only on immediate
    > exposure, does it seep into people to reemerge weeks, months, years later
    or
    > what? There's no coherence to this kind of contagion idea to my mind.

    Hi everyone,

    I do agree with Vincent here !
    I find it very odd that after such a long period of time, a yound lad got
    the
    idea to crash a plane into a building !
    On Belgium TV, already the views with contempt were spread, the boy
    was sick, he was insane, he got a low intelligence profile, he was
    desperate,
    that kind of nonsens.

    Like I said in an earlier post, it all can come down to childsplay. Even the
    ' proof ' of being influenced by bin Laden, the suicide- note... like I
    said,
    we do anything do discharge the child from any responsibility.
    No the kid was not insane, he was under influence of bin Laden !

    In my mind, the real contaigon agent, is the fact that another plane crashed
    into a building. The mere idea of fear transmitted itself throughtout the
    world.
    Intangibled with the constructions of what happened on the 9/ 11 the patho-
    gens of fear spread. The captivating idea of crashing planes into buildings
    is IMO not the contaigon that sweeped across the land.

    Read Stephen E Ross,
    http://www.annals.org/issues/v131n11/full/199912070-00019.html

    Regards,

    Kenneth

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jan 07 2002 - 18:53:19 GMT