Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id HAA15443 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 29 Dec 2001 07:42:09 GMT Message-Id: <200112290737.fBT7bVS00247@sherri.harvard.edu> Subject: Fwd: Empirical Studies Validate Prominence of Unconscious Processes Date: Sat, 29 Dec 2001 02:37:39 -0500 x-sender: wsmith1@camail.harvard.edu x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T. Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu> To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>, "SKEPTIC-L" <skeptic@listproc.hcf.jhu.edu> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Empirical Studies Validate Prominence of Unconscious Processes
by Deborah A. Lott
Psychiatric Times July 2000 Vol. XVII Issue 7
http://www.mhsource.com/pt/p000766.html
In a 1999 article in the Journal of the American Psychoanalytic 
Association (JAPA), Boston University psychologist and research associate 
professor Drew Westen, Ph.D., drew on a rich body of experimental studies 
attesting to the prominence of unconscious processes in mental life. 
Culled largely from cognitive psychology, these studies describe this 
mental activity as subliminal priming, implicit memory or automatic 
activation, rather than as unconscious per se. Nevertheless, Westen 
regards the implication of this research to be clear: "Consciousness is 
the tip of the psychic iceberg that Freud imagined it to be" (1999).
During a presentation at the 1999 annual meeting of the American 
Psychoanalytic Association, Westen concluded, "The evidence of 
unconscious processes-cognitive, motivational and affective-is now 
incontrovertible and should inform our clinical thinking." In an 
interview with Psychiatric Times, Westen discussed the studies and their 
relevance to clinicians.
In general, the data call for another look at the Freudian notion of the 
unconscious-they don't vindicate it in its entirety. "It's time to get 
past the idea that there is an unconscious," explained Westen. "What 
research in cognitive science is now clearly demonstrating is that we 
have multiple unconscious processes mediated by different neural systems."
Conscious and Unconscious
Some of the earliest demonstrations of the dissociation of conscious 
processes and unconscious processes came from observing patients with 
neurological deficits. Korsakoff's disorder, a consequence of long-term 
alcoholism, results in an inability to form or retrieve any new conscious 
memories, so that patients report amnesia for the recent past. The 
research suggests, however, that their experience is implicitly or 
unconsciously stored psychically in a way that influences their affects 
and motivations.
Westen (1999) recounted a famous demonstration from nearly a century ago. 
Psychologist Edouard Claparède (described in Cowey, 1991) hid a pin 
between his fingers so that, as he shook the hand of a patient with 
Korsakoff's disorder, he pricked the patient's palm. When re-introduced 
to Claparède a few days later, the patient had no conscious recollection 
of having met him but refused, nevertheless, to shake his hand, feeling 
as if something bad might happen. "The Korsakoff's patient had stored the 
affective associations that made him unwilling to shake Claparède's hand 
again," said Westen. These associations remained outside of 
consciousness. Implicit, associative memories influenced the patient's 
emotions, motives and behavior, although he lacked any conscious 
awareness of them.
In another, more recent experiment, Korsakoff's patients read fictional 
biographies of two different men's photographs, one depicted in positive 
terms and the other in negative language (Johnson et al., 1985). About 20 
days later, the subjects could not recall any prior exposure to the 
characters. Yet they preferred the "good" character when asked to choose 
between them. "Such neurological cases," wrote Westen (1999) in JAPA, 
"suggest that the neural circuitry for affective associative 
learning-learning to connect stimuli with feelings-is distinct from the 
neural circuitry for conscious, explicit learning, just as implicit and 
explicit memory have been shown to be neuroanatomically distinct."
The 'Priming' Literature
This disconnection of conscious from unconscious processing has been 
demonstrated just as dramatically in neurologically intact subjects. 
According to Westen, we all form networks of association that remain 
outside of conscious awareness and yet influence our feelings, 
motivations and behaviors. A large cognitive literature on priming (which 
Westen describes in detail in the JAPA article) documents the existence 
and activation of these networks. Westen convincingly demonstrated how 
priming works in presentations last year at the national meetings of both 
the American Psychoanalytical and American Psychological Associations. 
When members of the audience first heard him say the words ocean, beach, 
moon and waves and were then asked to name a laundry detergent, the 
majority responded with Tide. The preceding words "acted as a prime to 
activate a network of associations," he explained.
Priming studies have not only shown that exposure to a prime will 
influence a subject's responses, but that this exposure can be subliminal 
or supraliminal and still have the same effect (Bowers and Schacter, 
1990; Schacter, 1992).
For example, in dichotic listening tests, subjects hear two distinct 
streams of information simultaneously through two separate channels of a 
pair of earphones. When taught to attend to only one channel and ignore 
the other, their "conscious recognition memory for information presented 
in the unattended channel is at chance levels" (Westen, 1999). In other 
words, he explained, if you ask them whether they have heard a particular 
word-such as taxi-in the unattended channel, their likelihood of getting 
the answer right is no better than chance. Nevertheless, after being 
exposed to the word pair taxi:cab in the unattended channel, subjects 
will be more likely to spell the auditorially presented homophone pair 
fare:fair as fare because of the unconscious association with taxi 
(Murphy and Zajonc, 1993; Westen, 1999).
Can Racism Be Implicit?
A priming study of implicit racism demonstrated how a network of 
affective associations can operate outside of awareness and reflect 
feelings at direct odds with those that are conscious. In 1995, Fazio and 
colleagues presented subjects with a series of photographs of 
African-American and Caucasian faces. Each face was followed by an 
adjective, which the subjects had to identify as positive or negative by 
pressing a key.
"If people have negative feelings toward blacks, seeing a black face will 
activate a network of unconscious negative associations so that when they 
see a negative word, they'll be primed to recognize it more quickly than 
they will a positive one," explained Westen.
This hypothesis was borne out: a subgroup of subjects did recognize the 
negative adjectives significantly faster after seeing an African-American 
face than after seeing a Caucasian face, and these subjects were rated as 
having a high degree of what the researchers called implicit racism.
When they attempted to correlate this implicit racism with the subjects' 
overt attitudes about race as assessed by self-report, "they found no 
correlation whatsoever," Westen said. There was a powerful disconnection 
between what people were aware of feeling and what they felt implicitly.
The researchers then added a final wrinkle by asking a young 
African-American woman to debrief the subjects and rate each on a scale 
of one to five according to her level of comfort with them. Whereas 
subjects' conscious, explicit attitudes about African-Americans were 
uncorrelated with these ratings, the implicit racism scores correlated 
highly (about 0.5) with the debriefer's degree of comfort with the 
subjects. Westen told PT, "What people express in their behavior over 
time and don't seem to be able to control very well is their implicit, 
affective associations."
Trauma, Shame and Violence
As part of his doctoral dissertation in 1999, Adam C. Conklin, Ph.D., a 
psychology fellow at Austen Riggs Center, explored the relationship 
between childhood abuse, feelings of shame and perpetration of violence, 
a link that several other authors had observed in working with 
perpetrators of violence (Gilligan, 1996; Scheff and Retzinger, 1991). In 
a series of studies, Conklin analyzed men who had been sexually or 
physically abused during childhood. This is a group that faces a 
significantly increased risk of committing acts of violence themselves.
In one study, subjects completed a self-report questionnaire that asked 
them about their own feelings of shame. Those subjects who had 
perpetrated violence reported feeling significantly less shame than did 
subjects with a history of child abuse who had not perpetrated acts of 
violence.
In a second study, a similar group of subjects took the Thematic 
Apperception Test (TAT), in which they were asked to make up narratives 
about relatively neutral human encounters. Subjects who had perpetrated 
violence revealed significantly more shame themes than did those with 
similar childhood histories who had not perpetrated violent acts. The 
findings of the explicit self-report measure and the implicit TAT measure 
were contradictory. This suggested to Westen that "the perpetrators felt 
shame unconsciously which they could not consciously expressŠIt may not 
be shame per se that distinguishes men who go on to abuse but 
unacknowledged shame."
The Implicit, Psychic Defenses
In Westen's mind, studies like those of Fazio et al. and Conklin have 
broad implications for how psychological research is conducted. He said, 
"The findings of researchers who rely on self-report as a measure of 
people's feelings and motivations [are apt to be] misleading at times, 
particularly when implicit and explicit feelings and attitudes conflict. 
The literature suggests that self-report correlates poorly with other, 
more implicit measures of people's feelings and motives." Westen further 
explained, "When you are asking people about anything they might have 
feelings about, you've got to measure a second, more implicit way, 
because people can be motivated by feelings that they don't know about 
themselves."
From a clinical standpoint, Westen wrote (1999), "[This evidence] poses a 
challenge to competing therapeutic schools that assume that change can be 
accomplishedŠquickly and without careful attention to uncovering and 
altering unconscious associative networks." Dealing only with conscious 
feelings or cognitions may be an inadequate approach to changing feelings 
or behaviors in the long term.
On the other hand, thinking about unconscious processes in traditional 
psychoanalytic terms may be misleading as well, according to Westen. 
Freud depicted the unconscious as the realm of the forbidden wish, sexual 
and aggressive drives, the primitive, and the libidinal, while current 
research suggests that content need not be primitive, sexual or 
aggressive to be unconscious. "Unconscious networks of association form 
as a result of life experience," said Westen, "and there's no necessary 
connection between drives, wishes, primitive mental processes and 
associationist thinking. From an evolutionary perspective, forming 
associations unconsciously and acting on them outside of awareness is 
adaptive," he explained. "No one could consciously process all the 
information necessary to perform all mental functions."
The psychoanalyst's tendency to assume that feelings are always kept 
unconscious for defensive reasons needs to be revised, according to 
Westen's point of view. "People can be unaware of their emotions, or of 
the triggers for emotions, for any number of reasons, including the fact 
that activation of emotions is an implicit process," he explained. But he 
also acknowledged that some research suggests psychic defenses can 
operate in just this fashion, with measurable consequences.
A group of researchers (Shedler et al., 1993) asked subjects to report 
their own symptoms of psychological distress, such as anxiety, depression 
or unhappiness. They were also asked to describe their earliest memories, 
"essentially an implicit measure of feelings about significant 
relationships," said Westen. Without knowledge of the subjects' 
self-assessments, raters evaluated the subjects on the basis of their 
childhood memories.
If anecdotes of early life were filled with psychological pain and seemed 
chaotic, the raters tended to evaluate the subjects as being 
psychologically distressed. The subjects were then categorized into three 
groups: those who said they were distressed and the raters agreed; those 
who said they were not distressed and the raters agreed; and a third 
group who denied distress and the raters disagreed.
All three groups were then subjected to mildly stressful tasks, such as 
reading aloud or performing a phrase association test. Those subjects who 
denied feeling the distress implicit in their childhood histories showed 
disproportionate physiological stress responses, such as rises in heart 
rate and blood pressure, when compared to the other two groups.
While reporting "the lowest conscious test anxiety," they also expressed 
"numerous signs of unacknowledged psychic discomfort such as stammering, 
stuttering, sighing and blocking," explained Westen. "This is as clear a 
demonstration of defensive blocking off of affective experience as anyone 
has ever produced." The findings also suggest that psychic defenses have 
their costs. "Keeping yourself chronically unaware of your own affects 
takes its toll physiologically," he added.
Implications for Clinicians
How can understanding and delineating the different types of unconscious 
processes improve the practice of psychotherapy? "Thinking more carefully 
about the different kinds of unconscious processes will allow us to think 
more carefully about what it is that we want to change [in therapy] and 
how we are going to change it," Westen told PT. "Part of helping people 
change is helping them recognize unconscious networks of association 
which are guiding their behavior," he said, a task that may be well 
served by psychoanalytic methods. "But if you want someone to change a 
conscious process," he added, "you may need, as the 
cognitive-behaviorists do, to key in on the conscious process."
If this research suggests that the psychotherapy patient may need to 
integrate some disconnected aspects of conscious and unconscious 
processing to improve affect and behavior, it also suggests that the 
field of psychotherapy needs to undergo a similar process of integration. 
From Westen's perspective, it is high time for clinicians to integrate 
the empirical findings of cognitive science with psychodynamic theory.
References
Bowers JS, Schacter DL (1990), Implicit memory and test awareness. J Exp 
Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 16(3):404-416.
Cowey A (1991), Visual perception. Grasping the essentials. Nature 
349(6305):102-103.
Fazio RH, Jackson JR, Dunton BC, Williams CJ (1995), Variability in 
automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: a 
bona fide pipeline? J Pers Soc Psychol 69(6):1013-1027.
Gilligan J (1996), Violence: Our Deadly Epidemic and Its Causes. New 
York: G.P. Putnam.
Johnson MK, Kim JK, Risse G (1985), Do alcoholic Korsakoff's syndrome 
patients acquire affective reactions? J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 
11(1):22-36.
Murphy ST, Zajonc RB (1993), Affect, cognition, and awareness: affective 
priming with optimal and suboptimal stimulus exposures. J Pers Soc 
Psychol 64(5):723-739.
Schacter DL (1992), Understanding implicit memory. A cognitive 
neuroscience approach. Am Psychol 47(4):559-569.
Scheff TJ, Retzinger SM (1991), Emotions and Violence: Shame and Rage in 
Destructive Conflicts. Lexington, Mass.: Lexington Books.
Shedler J, Mayman M, Manis M (1993), The illusion of mental health. Am 
Psychol 48(11):1117-1131.
Westen D (1999), The scientific status of unconscious processes: is Freud 
really dead? J Am Psychoanal Assoc 47(4):1061-1106.
===============================This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Dec 29 2001 - 07:48:35 GMT