Re: Wilkins on the meme:engram relation

From: Wade T. Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Thu Dec 13 2001 - 00:39:25 GMT

  • Next message: John Wilkins: "Re: Definition please" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id AAA18287 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 13 Dec 2001 00:44:11 GMT
Message-Id: <200112130039.fBD0dN116329@sherri.harvard.edu>
Subject: Re: Wilkins on the meme:engram relation
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2001 19:39:25 -0500
x-sender: wsmith1@camail.harvard.edu
x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
From: "Wade T. Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    Hi John Wilkins -

    >But if we can divest ourselves of the scala naturae version
    >of evolution that preceded Darwin, then we can usefully apply the
    >mindset of evolution to culture.

    Hear, hear.

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Dec 13 2001 - 00:54:34 GMT