Re: The selfish gene meme

From: William Benzon (bbenzon@mindspring.com)
Date: Fri Dec 07 2001 - 13:11:08 GMT

  • Next message: Price, Ilfryn: "RE: The selfish gene meme"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA08323 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 7 Dec 2001 13:15:50 GMT
    User-Agent: Microsoft-Outlook-Express-Macintosh-Edition/5.02.2022
    Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2001 08:11:08 -0500
    Subject: Re: The selfish gene meme
    From: William Benzon <bbenzon@mindspring.com>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Message-ID: <B835A390.D203%bbenzon@mindspring.com>
    In-Reply-To: <A0419A5A-EA9C-11D5-A082-003065B4D1F0@wehi.edu.au>
    Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    on 12/6/01 5:57 PM, John Wilkins at wilkins@wehi.edu.au wrote:

    >
    > On Thursday, December 6, 2001, at 11:19 PM, Price, Ilfryn wrote:
    >
    >> ...
    >
    >> Interestingly, your use of the term "replication space"
    >>> suggests that you are
    >>> referring to something that is defined with sufficient
    >>> mathematical precision
    >>> to call for a coordinate system. Some readers will want to
    >>> know in exact
    >>> quantitative terms how that space is defined, which in turn
    >>> may cause them to
    >>> want to know in more exact terms how the word "meme" is defined.
    >>
    >> I can appreciate how it would suggest that precision to a physicist but
    >> I used it as no more than metaphor. C.f Dennet's space in the
    >> Libraries of Mendel and Babel.
    >>
    > I think semantic spaces are much more than metaphors, but that the
    > metrics are not absolute. Nevertheless, they can be measured
    > contextually. This is done, often not well, in the social sciences all
    > the time (eg, in "attitudinal surveys"). There was an old book entitled
    > _The Measurement of Meaning_ back int he 50s on the subject. I reference
    > it in
    >

    That's classic work. A more recent work in the same tradition is:

    Charles E. Osgood, William H. May, and Murray S. Miron, Cross-Cultural
    Universals of Affective Meaning. U of Illinois Press, 1975.

    BB

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Dec 07 2001 - 13:28:51 GMT