Re: Units, Events, and Dynamics in the Evolutionary Epidemiology of Ideas

From: AaronLynch@aol.com
Date: Mon Dec 03 2001 - 01:51:36 GMT

  • Next message: John Wilkins: "Re: Wilkins on the meme:engram relation" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id BAA28829 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 3 Dec 2001 01:56:42 GMT
From: <AaronLynch@aol.com>
Message-ID: <94.1df9f255.293c34a8@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Dec 2001 20:51:36 EST
Subject: Re: Units, Events, and Dynamics in the Evolutionary Epidemiology of Ideas
To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 4.0 for Windows 95 sub 113
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    In a message dated 12/1/2001 11:02:34 PM Central Standard Time, Wade Smith
    <wade_smith@harvard.edu> writes:

    > >The word "meme" is briefly discussed in a footnote
    >
    > Which is perhaps, where it should reside, and might, after all....
    >
    > And now, off to fetch your paper.
    >
    > - Wade

    Hi Wade.

    Yes, too much argumentation has swirled around the various interpretations of
    a few neologisms. People who may be trying to say fairly similar things can
    find small differences seeming larger due to different word definitions.

    --Aaron Lynch

    http://www.thoughtcontagion.com

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Dec 03 2001 - 02:08:27 GMT