Re: Taxonomy and speciation

From: Scott Chase (ecphoric@hotmail.com)
Date: Fri Nov 30 2001 - 04:37:46 GMT

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Re: the hook"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id EAA23195 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 30 Nov 2001 04:42:43 GMT
    X-Originating-IP: [209.240.222.132]
    From: "Scott Chase" <ecphoric@hotmail.com>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Taxonomy and speciation
    Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 23:37:46 -0500
    Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
    Message-ID: <F8CBlGkVf370SkbsGuB0000370b@hotmail.com>
    X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Nov 2001 04:37:46.0406 (UTC) FILETIME=[C2203C60:01C17958]
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    >From: "Philip A.E. Jonkers" <phae@uclink.berkeley.edu>
    >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >Subject: Re: Taxonomy and speciation
    >Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 16:42:48 -0800
    >
    >Scott:
    > > I suppose endangered and threatened species are actually just endangered
    > > and threatened "name tags".
    >
    >I don't have the impression you understand the point I'm trying to get
    >across.
    >Species-names have all the virtues as functioning as pointers to the
    >organisms they represent. It's shorthand to a set of properties the
    >specie-name reflect (furry, 4-legged, aggressive, cudly, mammalian,
    >reptilian, small, big, etc.). Each species has its own set of properties. I
    >recognize the virtues of having species-names just as much as the next guy.
    >But the name-giving process is a mentally human one. It is based on human
    >intention not some intrinsic process in nature.
    >I do not deny organisms evolve of course, but the fluid act of
    >speciation does not occur in nature since the invention of names is
    >an entirely human enterprise. Why don't you have a look at On the
    >origin of species chapter 2, where Darwin mentions the problems
    >taxonomists having in deciding which groups of organisms to label
    >as varieties and which as species. Small wonder since this whole business
    >of name-tagging is a human enterprise.
    >
    >
    So you're saying that speciation does not occur? Do I have you correct here?

    Varietes or subspecies may represent species in the making. Ever here of
    incipience? This got Goldschmidt's dander up if I recall him aright.

    You have a series of subspecies along a continuum. Each subspecies can
    interbreed with the other except for those at the extremes of the continuum.
    If the intermediates were wiped out the extreme subspecies *could* be
    considered full-fledged species.

    _________________________________________________________________
    Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Nov 30 2001 - 04:48:54 GMT