Re: A Question for Wade

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Thu Nov 29 2001 - 12:40:11 GMT

  • Next message: Ray Recchia: "Re: Definition please"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id MAA21439 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 29 Nov 2001 12:45:05 GMT
    Subject: Re: A Question for Wade
    Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 07:40:11 -0500
    x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu
    x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
    From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
    To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Message-ID: <20011129124008.AAA9759@camailp.harvard.edu@[205.240.180.2]>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Hi Joe Dees -

    >we, due to self-conscious awareness, intention and (imperfectly)
    >intention-controllable ideation, have the possibility for either.

    That is true for all behaviors, at all times.

    Yes?

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 29 2001 - 12:51:28 GMT