Re: artefacts

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Thu Nov 29 2001 - 00:54:46 GMT

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Re: circular logic"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id AAA19924 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 29 Nov 2001 00:59:44 GMT
    Subject: Re: artefacts
    Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 19:54:46 -0500
    x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu
    x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
    From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
    To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
    Message-ID: <20011129005445.AAA1752@camailp.harvard.edu@[205.240.180.33]>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Hi Ray Recchia -

    >However, your
    >artefacts still need to reproduce somehow if you are going to consider them
    >evolutionary replicators.

    No, new ones have to be made. And made again.

    >Imitation has
    >been tendered by behaviorists as a blanket method of explaining replication
    >in large part because they wanted to avoid having to delve too deeply into
    >the unknowns of the human mind.

    Not my fault they're taking the easy way out.

    >Otherwise you have no way of
    >distinguishing your artefacts from artefacts created by birds or
    >wasps.

    That's more problematic, I'll agree. However, I think eyewitness
    testimony and patent attorneys will settle most of the cases brought
    against us by the wasps.

    >In the next few decades the human race will likely begin genetically
    >altering itself. This will make humans artefacts of themselves and thus by
    >your definition - memes.

    Yup, that's entirely a fact. What a brave new world it will be....

    >In closing, I would like to admonish you for having taken on the devil as a
    >client when fellow Massachusetts jurist Daniel Webster fought so hard to
    >defeat him in the early part of the U.S.A's development.

    Now, I know most lawyers are snakes. I'm a divorced father in
    Massachusetts- don't begin to start me up! And while I have never stated
    that I'm taking the devil's side, I don't think there's one single thing
    angelic about the memes-are-in-the-mind position at all.

    So, I guess I have to admonish you for taking on the angels as your
    client.

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Nov 29 2001 - 01:05:55 GMT