RE: A Question for Wade

From: Scott Chase (ecphoric@hotmail.com)
Date: Wed Nov 28 2001 - 23:31:48 GMT

  • Next message: Scott Chase: "Re: circular logic"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id XAA19760 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 28 Nov 2001 23:36:45 GMT
    X-Originating-IP: [209.240.222.132]
    From: "Scott Chase" <ecphoric@hotmail.com>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: RE: A Question for Wade
    Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 18:31:48 -0500
    Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed
    Message-ID: <F176l8aii08N8yxdZjf00013492@hotmail.com>
    X-OriginalArrivalTime: 28 Nov 2001 23:31:48.0730 (UTC) FILETIME=[D9AF6DA0:01C17864]
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    >From: "Lawrence DeBivort" <debivort@umd5.umd.edu>
    >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    >Subject: RE: A Question for Wade
    >Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 08:35:10 -0500
    >
    >It is an excellent idea, in that it has allowed distinctions to be made
    >that
    >have proved useful in the fields of sociology (e.g. understanding of
    >social,
    >religious and political movements), linguisitics (e.g. structure of
    >self-dissemination and self-protection), psychology (e.g. personality
    >profiling), and persuasion.
    >
    What proportion of professionals in these fields actually use memetics as
    the basis of their work? Has memetics had an impact beyond the fishbowl of
    memetics itself or beyond some popularizations. Are a large proportion of
    serious professionals in the subdivisions of the social sciences serious
    about the supposed toolbox of memetics or do they pass it off as a toybox
    perhaps?
    >
    >Professionally and technically, I view myself as indebted to Dawkins for
    >the
    >nubbin of the idea, and several others, many on this list, for sharing in
    >the process of discovery that has advanced us to this point.
    >
    Recapitulationists may hve had similar sentiment toward Haeckel in another
    era for a simplistic parallel between ontogeny and phylogeny.
    >
    >Lawrence de Bivort
    >The Memetics Group
    >
    > > > > >meme sounds nicer.
    > > > >
    > > > > It is an attractive, catchy, little word, ain't it?
    > > > >
    > > > > Like a new peanut butter, ready to spread on crackers and toast.
    > > > >
    > > > > Probably one of the reasons people want to put it in every
    > > casserole in
    > > > > their ovens.
    > > >
    > > >Sounds like you're saying it's a successful meme.
    > > >
    > > >
    > > But is it a good idea?
    >
    >
    >===============================================================
    >This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    >Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    >For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    >see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    _________________________________________________________________
    Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 28 2001 - 23:42:52 GMT