Re: A Question for Wade

From: Robin Faichney (robin@ii01.org)
Date: Wed Nov 28 2001 - 13:53:19 GMT

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "RE: Field of Memes" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id OAA18232 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 28 Nov 2001 14:00:12 GMT
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 13:53:19 +0000
To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Subject: Re: A Question for Wade
Message-ID: <20011128135319.C2031@ii01.org>
References: <20011128124856.AAA15466@camailp.harvard.edu@[205.240.180.132]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20011128124856.AAA15466@camailp.harvard.edu@[205.240.180.132]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i
From: Robin Faichney <robin@ii01.org>
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    On Wed, Nov 28, 2001 at 07:48:58AM -0500, Wade T.Smith wrote:
    > Hi Robin Faichney -
    >
    > >But it's not an artifact.
    >
    > Correct, the word meme is not, in and of itself, but, there it is, eleven
    > words back.
    >
    > Print it and hang it up.
    >
    > Although, I suppose I was not being true to my stance.
    >
    > So, it's a successful fad. It's a popular term. It's a nifty sound.
    >
    > But, yeah, it is not a meme.

    I'm sorry, I don't have much stamina for stupid word games. 

    -- 
"The distinction between mind and matter is in the mind, not in matter."
Robin Faichney -- inside information -- http://www.ii01.org/

    ===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 28 2001 - 14:41:46 GMT