Re: circular logic

From: Robin Faichney (robin@ii01.org)
Date: Wed Nov 28 2001 - 10:49:19 GMT

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: A Question for Wade"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id LAA17705 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 28 Nov 2001 11:07:12 GMT
    Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2001 10:49:19 +0000
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: circular logic
    Message-ID: <20011128104919.A1499@ii01.org>
    References: <20011127194615.A548@ii01.org> <B88E8FD8-E376-11D5-96F1-003065A0F24C@harvard.edu>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
    Content-Disposition: inline
    In-Reply-To: <B88E8FD8-E376-11D5-96F1-003065A0F24C@harvard.edu>
    User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i
    From: Robin Faichney <robin@ii01.org>
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On Tue, Nov 27, 2001 at 03:38:31PM -0500, Wade Smith wrote:
    >
    > If all you mean by imitation is that wheels all look alike,
    > well, they don't.

    Of course there are differences but they all work on the same
    principle. That's what makes them wheels.

    > They are all circular though (the ones that
    > work), and if all you mean by imitation is that all wheels are
    > circular, well, of course they are. They're wheels.

    As you well know, there's more to a wheel than being circular. Only a
    small subset of circular things are wheels.

    > And if all
    > you mean by imitation is that designers working on a wheel
    > prototype have to draw a circle every time, well, I think the
    > circle is a little more basic to design then that.

    Designers not only have to draw a circle, they either have to start
    with the idea of a wheel, or they have to reinvent it. I say that
    in approximately 99.99% of cases (or more), they start with the idea,
    in other words they do not originate, but imitate. Can you deny that?

    -- 
    Robin Faichney 
    "It is tempting to suppose that some concept of information could serve
    eventually to unify mind, matter, and meaning in a single theory," say
    Daniel Dennett and John Haugeland. The theory is here: http://www.ii01.org/
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Nov 28 2001 - 11:32:13 GMT