Re: Definition, Please

From: Kenneth Van Oost (Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be)
Date: Tue Nov 27 2001 - 19:06:30 GMT

  • Next message: Robin Faichney: "Re: Study shows brain can learn without really trying"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id TAA15935 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 27 Nov 2001 19:06:57 GMT
    Message-ID: <001301c17776$b950a180$fb03bed4@default>
    From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    References: <20011126041718.AAA20176%camailp.harvard.edu@[205.240.180.14]>
    Subject: Re: Definition, Please
    Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2001 20:06:30 +0100
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
    X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Wade T.Smith <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
    To: Memetics Discussion List <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>

    > Coming down on the side of artifact memes (and artifact memes only),
    > don't seem to me to be heretical at all- in fact, I'm pretty sure it's
    > one of only three choices that are available- either memes are inside, or
    > outside, or some combination of the two. After wrestling with various
    > explanations of all three, and then wrestling with the way they interact
    > with other models of life, the universe, and everything, I cut out the
    > crap with Occam's razor, and I was left with choice number one- memes are
    > outside and artifactual, period. What's inside is something else. Human
    > evolution requires sexual reproduction, and the only way memetic
    > evolution could happen would require a sexual component as well.
    >
    > And, so far, sex is physical. And so far, memes are physical. Interior
    > sex is, well, impossible. Lust as much as you want in your heart, but, it
    > won't make a child.

    Hi Wade,

    Interesting point this !

    Memetical sex !? 2 lines of thought could be attracted to eachother due
    to differences in their individual isomorphism, I don 't know !
    But, anyway, ' sex ' is possible, 2 lines of thought would produce
    offspring
    in the sense they give birth to a new line of thought, to a new idea, a new
    skill, new experience, a new form of communication.

    But, it is a kind of orgy in our head, and memes or neural connections are
    not monogamous, they do it with any other neural trace.

    And IMO, sex has not to be physical !
    Remerber nuns have some spiritual connection with god. Some of them
    have even a sexual relationship with their lord, even orgasms.
    But most of the time the relationship stays non- physical.
    Believing is having sex... as I remerber the saying rightly.

    Regards,

    Kenneth

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 27 2001 - 19:12:57 GMT