Re: Definition, Please

From: Joe Dees (joedees@addall.com)
Date: Tue Nov 27 2001 - 04:22:53 GMT

  • Next message: Dace: "Re: Study shows brain can learn without really trying"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id EAA14647 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 27 Nov 2001 04:27:56 GMT
    Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 20:22:53 -0800
    Message-Id: <200111270422.fAR4Mrx18207@mail7.bigmailbox.com>
    Content-Type: text/plain
    Content-Disposition: inline
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: binary
    X-Mailer: MIME-tools 4.104 (Entity 4.116)
    X-Originating-Ip: [216.76.251.115]
    From: "Joe Dees" <joedees@addall.com>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Definition, Please
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ('binary' encoding is not supported, stored as-is)

    > "Philip A.E. Jonkers" <phae@uclink.berkeley.edu> memetics@mmu.ac.uk Re: Definition, PleaseDate: Sun, 25 Nov 2001 18:09:41 -0800
    >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    >
    >> > > Is "What's up Doc?" memetic?
    >
    >Phil:
    >> >I don't know what inspired you to suggest that but technically speaking,
    >> >yes.
    >> >Go ask a kid, any kid (provided they can speak a little at least),
    >> >if he or she knows that phrase. A 99 out of 100 chance he/she knows it.
    >> >And if not, after you have uttered the slogan in front of that kid,
    >> >it will stick to his little brain like flies on ...
    >> >In fact, too make it a little more bolder, anything verbal is memetic
    >> >by definition (and I mean anything), it's only the question how
    >> >successful the slogan is or will be.
    >
    >Scott:
    >> Some of us are better at resisting assimilation by the memetic Borg cube
    >> than others :-)
    >
    >Ohmygod, I'm starting to blush right here. What in the devil's name is a
    >Borg cube?
    >
    >> At best, *maybe* a slogan such as "What's up Doc?" qualifies at it rides
    >> atop a verbal system, but assimilating the entirety of the verbal system or
    >> language itself as memetic...what would the linguists think of this
    >> assimilation (and is there going to be accomodation?)? Can they outrun the
    >> cube before it's too late?
    >
    >I couln't really say (see above). Let me elaborate a little on what I mean.
    >Literally anything that we say is memetic. Anything that can be captured in
    >words (albeit one) can be passed on onto the next guy. It's that simple.
    >If it can not be transmitted from person to person, it's not a meme. Since
    >`anything' verbal can, `anything' has to be a meme by definition.
    >
    As is anything technological, for as anything that can be said can be heard and understood, anything that can be done can be shown, imitated and learned.
    >
    >Philip.
    >
    >===============================================================
    >This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    >Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    >For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    >see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    ------------------------------------------------------------
    Looking for a book? Want a deal? No problem AddALL!
    http://www.addall.com compares book price at 41 online stores.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Nov 27 2001 - 04:41:59 GMT