Re: Definition, Please

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Sat Nov 24 2001 - 00:01:50 GMT

  • Next message: joedees@bellsouth.net: "Verbal memeticism" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id AAA07477 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 24 Nov 2001 00:06:49 GMT
Subject: Re: Definition, Please
Date: Fri, 23 Nov 2001 19:01:50 -0500
x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu
x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-ID: <20011124000146.AAA26837@camailp.harvard.edu@[205.240.180.140]>
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    Hi Philip A.E. Jonkers -

    >anything verbal is memetic by definition

    And so is that can of worms.

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 24 2001 - 00:17:42 GMT