Re: Debunking pseudoscience: Why horoscopes really work...

From: Wade T. Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Sat Nov 10 2001 - 01:06:46 GMT

  • Next message: Philip Jonkers: "RE: Bin Laden's Statement" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id BAA10996 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 10 Nov 2001 01:15:21 GMT
From: "Wade T. Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: Debunking pseudoscience: Why horoscopes really work...
Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2001 20:06:46 -0500
Message-Id: <20011110010646.13215@camail2.harvard.edu>
In-Reply-To: <1005346886.3bec60463ff13@rugth1.phys.rug.nl>
References: <1005346886.3bec60463ff13@rugth1.phys.rug.nl>
X-Mailer: CTM PowerMail 3.0.9v2 <http://www.ctmdev.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    Hi Philip --

    >smitherines

    Now, I know I'm not replying to the main subject of your post, but, for
    some obvious reasons, I happen to know that it's 'smithereens'....

    But, just for the fun of it, take a look at http://skepdic.com/
    astrolgy.html , where my favorite line is - "I can only conclude that
    astrologers have more influence than the stars do."

    (And if'n you want, also at http://home.wxs.nl/~skepsis/astrot.html ,
    which is a website of one of the #skeptics on Starchat.)

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Nov 10 2001 - 01:21:03 GMT