Re: Memes in Brains

From: Wade T.Smith (wade_smith@harvard.edu)
Date: Fri Oct 19 2001 - 21:35:24 BST

  • Next message: Philip Jonkers: "Fitness increment hypothesis" 

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id VAA22742 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 19 Oct 2001 21:40:42 +0100
Subject: Re: Memes in Brains
Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 16:35:24 -0400
x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu
x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas
From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>
To: "memetics list" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Message-ID: <20011019203542.AAA4152@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]>
Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk

    On 10/19/01 15:02, Robin Faichney said this-

    >To value subjectivity is [to] place your own perceptions above mere hearsay.

    And to value objectivity is to place your own perceptions where they
    belong. Which is hopefully amidst the tests of science.

    - Wade

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Oct 19 2001 - 22:11:22 BST