Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id DAA07542 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 8 Oct 2001 03:36:42 +0100 From: "Richard Brodie" <richard@brodietech.com> To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Subject: RE: Memes inside brain Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2001 19:32:01 -0700 Message-ID: <JJEIIFOCALCJKOFDFAHBCEJBDJAA.richard@brodietech.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.2416 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 In-Reply-To: <3BC0EE47.C5EEDB79@pacbell.net> Importance: Normal Sender: fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
<<Pardon me, but I thought that the orthodox view was that memes are
inherited by imitation. What's new about that?>>
I don't know about "orthodox." Susan Blackmore is the main proponent of that
view. I described many methods of meme transmission other than direct
imitation in VIRUS OF THE MIND. As you pointed out in other messages, it
seems evident to me that there are many types of memes that could not
possibly be transmitted by direct imitation.
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Oct 08 2001 - 03:42:09 BST