Re: Thesis: Memes are DNA-Slaves

From: Philip Jonkers (P.A.E.Jonkers@phys.rug.nl)
Date: Sat Sep 29 2001 - 17:02:09 BST

  • Next message: Philip Jonkers: "RE: Thesis: Memes are DNA-Slaves"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id RAA19872 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk); Sat, 29 Sep 2001 17:08:34 +0100
    From: Philip Jonkers <P.A.E.Jonkers@phys.rug.nl>
    X-Authentication-Warning: rugth1.phys.rug.nl: www-data set sender to jonkers@localhost using -f
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Thesis: Memes are DNA-Slaves
    Message-ID: <1001779329.3bb5f081d71cd@rugth1.phys.rug.nl>
    Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2001 18:02:09 +0200 (CEST)
    References: <E15n4kx-0007i6-00@dryctnath.mmu.ac.uk>
    In-Reply-To: <E15n4kx-0007i6-00@dryctnath.mmu.ac.uk>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
    User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.6
    X-Originating-IP: 129.125.13.3
    Sender: fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Quoting salice <salice@gmx.net>:

    >
    > > Memes will dispurse themselves from their biological container and
    > > will live their lives in a memosphere- like environment
    >
    > maybe we already live in a memosphere. i mean if you look at the
    > physical universe, atoms, electrons and so on follow certain rules.
    > like gravity, energy relations. simple rules. this rule is an
    > information. it lies beneath matter. so who made up this rule and
    > created these memes which are the basic rules for our universe?
    >
    > is the universe then to be imagined as a big brain with a simple meme
    > controlling it's basic behavior? or is it just that the universe
    > works the way we think, the way that memes tell us.
    > so is the possibility there that actually we created the universe in
    > our head?

    Think of this way: if the parameters of the universe, gravitational
    constant, speed of light, interaction strenghts of weak force
    and strong force, were to change only slightly, the universe
    would collapse. The parameters `in use' give the universe a
    very delicate stability. Since we're boldly speculating now.
    Try this: The consensus is that our universe began with a Big Bang.
    Prior to the birth of our universe,
    suppose the parameters of the universe were chosen with
    random values. A certain choice of parameters would
    usually be fruitless in that the resulting baby universe would
    not be vital enough to survive and plunge back into a Big Crunch.
    This may have occurred a zillion times, generating zillion
    of tiny spot universes, until .... the randomly
    generated parameters were given the right values. That is, they
    had the values we have in our current universe. Stability ensued
    and our universe evolved...

    Philip.

     

     

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sat Sep 29 2001 - 17:13:51 BST