Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id QAA11780 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 26 Sep 2001 16:16:56 +0100 Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2001 15:47:44 +0100 To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk Subject: Re: Dawkins was right all along Message-ID: <20010926154744.C413@ii01.org> References: <20010925123313.AAA18628@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.15i In-Reply-To: <20010925123313.AAA18628@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]>; from wade_smith@harvard.edu on Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 08:32:29AM -0400 From: Robin Faichney <robin@ii01.org> Sender: fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 08:32:29AM -0400, Wade T.Smith wrote:
> On 09/25/01 05:35, Robin Faichney said this-
>
> >Those who believe in atheism
>
> Ah, but one cannot believe in atheism. Atheism is an intentional stance.
Care to explain that? Or will you rely on your usual trick of hiding
behind gnomic utterance? (Note the disjunctive. And don't imagine that
your "intentional stance" has anything of significance in common with
that of Dennett. In fact it would appear to be quite the opposite.)
-- Robin Faichney "It is tempting to suppose that some concept of information could serve eventually to unify mind, matter, and meaning in a single theory," say Daniel Dennett and John Haugeland. The theory is here: http://www.ii01.org/=============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Sep 26 2001 - 16:42:12 BST