Re: Time to lower the boom (was: Dawkins View)

From: Kenneth Van Oost (Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be)
Date: Mon Sep 24 2001 - 08:57:15 BST

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Re: Dawkins was right all along"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id OAA10831 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk); Wed, 26 Sep 2001 14:42:30 +0100
    Message-ID: <003601c144ce$fd1443c0$0d03bed4@default>
    From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
    To: "memetics" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: Re: Time to lower the boom (was: Dawkins View)
    Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2001 09:57:15 +0200
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
    X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    Sender: fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Kenneth Van Oost <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2001 10:08 PM
    Subject: Re: Time to lower the boom (was: Dawkins View)

    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: Lawrence DeBivort <debivort@umd5.umd.edu>
    > To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    > Sent: Friday, September 21, 2001 7:02 PM
    > Subject: RE: Time to lower the boom (was: Dawkins View)
    >
    >
    > > Past Septembers have seen 'memorable' black days in the Arab and Muslim
    > > worlds, including, IIRC, the attacks on the Palestinian camps in
    Lebanon.
    > I
    > > wonder if on the anniversary of those events there might be some new
    > > terrorist acts?
    > >
    > > To clarify, by 'pointless' I do not mean that we won't be the targets of
    > > terrorist acts again, but that the security measures now being taken
    won't
    > > stop them, if they are undertaken. By 'extravagant' I mean that the
    > measures
    > > are taking a big toll on people (airports, airport 'security', roads,
    > > businesses in 'vulnerable' locations, etc.) and making it harder for
    > people
    > > psychologically to settle back into normal lives--without a real pay-off
    > in
    > > deterrence of terrorist activity. A friend who manages a mid-size
    airport
    > > told me that they, along with all other airports, are engaging in all
    > sorts
    > > of FAA-mandated security measures, even though they all know it is a
    sham
    > > and does not improve real security against real threats. He singled out
    > the
    > > questioning and searching of passengers in this regard.
    >
    > Hi Lawrence,
    >
    > Terrorist activity will continue even after the improved security
    measures.
    > Terrorists, and they already has been patient, will wait until everybody
    > is off gard again. They are not stupid.
    > One of the suspects, in jail right now in Belgium, was a professional
    > football ( soccer) player, applauded every week by thousands of his
    > " enemies ". Those guys lives ordinary lives, no fuss.
    > They could be everybody's neighbour....
    >
    > Regards,
    >
    > Kenneth
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Sep 26 2001 - 15:44:17 BST