Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id EAA01649 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 23 Sep 2001 04:06:36 +0100 Subject: Re: Dawkins was right all along Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2001 22:59:34 -0400 x-sender: wsmith1@camail2.harvard.edu x-mailer: Claris Emailer 2.0v3, Claritas Est Veritas From: "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu> To: "Memetics Discussion List" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Message-ID: <20010923025935.AAA19677@camailp.harvard.edu@[205.240.180.43]> Sender: fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Hi Bill Spight -
> Wrong definition.
>
>> conviction of the truth of some
>> statement or the reality of some being or
>> phenomenon especially when based on
>> examination of evidence
Interesting take on 'belief' - and the first I've ever seen using
'evidence' within it. Sounds like an apologist wrote that dictionary.
I've got, from the American Heritage -
>belief n.
>1. The mental act, condition, or habit of placing trust or confidence in
>another.
>2. Mental acceptance of and conviction in the truth, actuality, or
>validity of something.
>3. Something believed or accepted as true, especially a particular tenet
>or a body of tenets accepted by a group of persons.
Beliefs rarely if ever rely upon evidence. Examinations of evidence is a
process of science.
- Wade
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Sun Sep 23 2001 - 04:11:30 BST