RE: FW: England humour

From: Vincent Campbell (v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk)
Date: Fri Sep 07 2001 - 14:35:44 BST

  • Next message: Lawrence DeBivort: "RE: FW: England humour"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id PAA10018 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 7 Sep 2001 15:03:06 +0100
    Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3102A6CFA5@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: FW: England humour
    Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 14:35:44 +0100 
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain
    X-Filter-Info: UoS MailScan 0.1 [D 1]
    Sender: fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

            Hi Philip,

            <There must be some sociological reason for
    > people taking up arms like that since they are prevalent all
    > over the globe. Perhaps it's an expression
    > of our natural lust for (tribal) warfare (survival of the
    > fittest, the `it's either him or me' attitude) when we're
    > lacking it now through modern-day society's inhibiting action
    > (law, ethics, social control, etc.)
    > It's seems to be our biological drive for animosity
    > still calling the cards. Jerks from tucked away,
    > long `forgotten' vestiges of brutal ancestry? >
    >
            I vaguely remember Richard Wright in 'The Moral Animal' talking
    about this kind of thing as one of the big problems for evolutionary
    psychology. Through kin selection it's reasonably straightforward to
    understand aggression towards non-family, and there's always reciprocal
    alturism to explain nice behaviour to non-family, but the capacity of humans
    to unite as units like fans of the same football team, or as part of an
    ideological "nation" ( in other words one that is more a construction than
    being rooted in distinct ethnic/religious/geographical origins, so nations
    like America or Australia I suppose; although all nations are ideological in
    one sense or another- Anderson's Imagined Community), doesn't seem to fit
    into a simple e.p. explanation.

            A gap here for memes to exploit? Genes drive kin selection, Memes
    drive (some aspects/kinds of) nationalism?

            Vincent

    -- 
    The University of Stirling is a university established in Scotland by
    charter at Stirling, FK9 4LA.  Privileged/Confidential Information may
    be contained in this message.  If you are not the addressee indicated
    in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such
    person), you may not disclose, copy or deliver this message to anyone
    and any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
    prohibited and may be unlawful.  In such case, you should destroy this
    message and kindly notify the sender by reply email.  Please advise
    immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email
    for messages of this kind.  Opinions, conclusions and other
    information in this message that do not relate to the official
    business of the University of Stirling shall be understood as neither
    given nor endorsed by it.
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Sep 07 2001 - 15:10:31 BST