Re: for the academics amongst us

From: Philip Jonkers (P.A.E.Jonkers@phys.rug.nl)
Date: Thu Sep 06 2001 - 16:23:20 BST

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Re: for the academics amongst us"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id QAA07615 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 6 Sep 2001 16:27:56 +0100
    From: Philip Jonkers <P.A.E.Jonkers@phys.rug.nl>
    X-Authentication-Warning: rugth1.phys.rug.nl: www-data set sender to jonkers@localhost using -f
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: for the academics amongst us
    Message-ID: <999789800.3b9794e86e05e@rugth1.phys.rug.nl>
    Date: Thu, 06 Sep 2001 17:23:20 +0200 (CEST)
    References: <20010904145915.AAA4515@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]>
    In-Reply-To: <20010904145915.AAA4515@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
    User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.5
    X-Originating-IP: 129.125.13.3
    Sender: fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    I was just playin' wit ya Wade,
    Poetry just ain't my bizniz.
    It's just that I found a symphatizer in Dirac
    (and a darned good one too, though he's your archetypical
    geek of brilliance!)

    Anyways: different strokes for different folks,
    or `blokes', depending on what side of the `pond' your at...

    Cheers!

    Philip.

    Quoting "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>:

    > On 09/04/01 10:41, Philip Jonkers said this-
    >
    > >``In science one tries to tell people,
    > > in such a way as to be understood by everyone,
    > > something that no one ever knew before.
    > > But in poetry, it's the exact opposite.''
    >
    > One way to look at it, I suppose, but, IMHO, both science and poetry are
    >
    > attempts to explain, to the maximum number of people, different
    > things.
    >
    > But both have requirements to be understood.
    >
    > It's just that some people like facts, and others like feelings.
    >
    > And some people like both.
    >
    > Wordsworth and Wilson.
    >
    > Chet Raymo, science reporter/columnist for the Boston Globe, is an
    > echoer
    > of my sentiment that both expressions of knowledge are equally
    > understandable, and equally important.
    >
    > - Wade
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Sep 06 2001 - 16:32:43 BST