Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id XAA22055 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk); Sun, 2 Sep 2001 23:42:41 +0100 Message-ID: <002d01c133f5$7e7e6020$d387b2d1@teddace> From: "Dace" <edace@earthlink.net> To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk> References: <F2662u4hadSyXqZ9Lmy00001af6@hotmail.com> Subject: Re: Misunderstood Cichlids Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2001 14:23:20 -0700 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400 Sender: fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Scott:
> Since isolation is related to speciation, we may have a slight problem. A
> population may become physically isolated from another of the same species
> by a geographical barrier, but as MR theory claims there is spooky action
at
> a distance. This action at a distance, if it can influence crystal growth
> and rodent learning in locales far removed, shouldn't have much problem
> jumping across a wimpy little geographical barrier. Wouldn't resonance and
> formative causation run counter to geographical isolation?
While isolation prompts speciation, resonance encourages parallel
development among the new species.
Ted
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Sep 03 2001 - 00:03:09 BST