RE: Cichlids & Memes

From: Vincent Campbell (v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk)
Date: Thu Aug 30 2001 - 13:26:27 BST

  • Next message: Bill Spight: "Re: Cichlids & Memes"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA15303 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 30 Aug 2001 13:31:19 +0100
    Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101746066@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Cichlids & Memes
    Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2001 13:26:27 +0100
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain
    X-Filter-Info: UoS MailScan 0.1 [D 1]
    Sender: fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    >>Of course whether fish really have culture or memes is, I suspect,
    a matter
    >>of some contention.

            <It's more a contention in some quarters to say, hmmm, with all
    these fish
    > and birds and other creatures employing behavioral algorithms, why should
    > we have any cause to claim _another_ mechanism (culture/memes) for our
    > behaviors- and could we then not say that culture is a complex formation
    > of these algorithms, and the admitted complication of language and
    > artifact-making? (Not to mention consciousness, but, that might be along
    > for the ride with language anyway.)
    >
    > Perhaps it's more of a blunting of Occam to call into existence memes.>
    >
            Hi Wade,

            Well, yes. Again there's that possiblity rearing its head.

            As I was typing about cichlids in isolated pools, I started thinking
    about tribes isolated by mountain ranges, or large rivers, or whatever, and
    the resultant changes in language, belief systems etc.

            A good example might be Easter Island. It appears there was a major
    transition in belief from a kind of personality cult surrounding past rulers
    (presumably) that relates to the famous statues, to a belief system relating
    to birds, particularly, IIRC, the Frigate bird. Now, why did this change
    occur? Could, at the most fundamental root, it have been related to the
    changing ecology of the island? It used to be forested, but humans
    basically deforested the entire island, affecting, of course, their food
    supplies as well as the wildlife. Perhaps a changing lifestyle related to
    the sea emerged, and seabirds became more appropriate symbols for that
    different lifestyle. Evidence of niche construction writ large perhaps?
            How might a memetics approach to this transition offer (to use
    Chris' useful comment from a few days ago) a better/more complete/simpler
    explanation?

            Perhaps that's not a fair example. Perhaps we need to explore the
    tranistion from one cultural trend to another, within a society without that
    kind of major environmental change going on.

            Interestingly, a recent series on the BBC ('Ancient Apocalypse')
    offered a number of very intriguing suggestions as to why several ancient
    civilisations fell (the Egyptian Old Kingdom- due to a major drought; the
    Minoans on Crete- due to to a huge volcanic eruption that destroyed a key
    port in the Minoan empire, and severely damage Minos itself; and some others
    that I missed through being on holiday). A far more ambitious, yet very
    similar claim was made by David Keys in his book 'Catastrophe', where he
    reckons that a mega-volcanic eruption at Krakatoa in the 7th century AD
    affected the entire world (by blotting out the sun for months causing crops
    to fail, famines etc. etc.), and had significant politico-religious
    consequences all round the world (e.g. environmental pressures added to the
    political unrest in the Middle East, helping to foster Islam is one of his
    bolder claims). The physical evidence for such major environmental changes
    is there in ice-core, and tree ring data. Keys probably goes way too far
    (and his book isn't very well written actually, especially for a
    journalist), but the stuff on the TV series was quite persuasive.

            Anyway, again the implication here is that some major historical
    events may have, at their root, environmental, natural causes. (The ten
    plagues of Egypt explanation is brilliant in this regard too). Are we
    simply too close to more recent historical events to see underlying
    environmental causal factors in them?

            Vincent

    -- 
    The University of Stirling is a university established in Scotland by
    charter at Stirling, FK9 4LA.  Privileged/Confidential Information may
    be contained in this message.  If you are not the addressee indicated
    in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such
    person), you may not disclose, copy or deliver this message to anyone
    and any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
    prohibited and may be unlawful.  In such case, you should destroy this
    message and kindly notify the sender by reply email.  Please advise
    immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email
    for messages of this kind.  Opinions, conclusions and other
    information in this message that do not relate to the official
    business of the University of Stirling shall be understood as neither
    given nor endorsed by it.
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 30 2001 - 13:35:59 BST