RE: Spoiled Reward-Pathway Hypothesis

From: Vincent Campbell (v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk)
Date: Tue Aug 28 2001 - 14:37:18 BST

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Re: Logic"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id OAA10282 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 28 Aug 2001 14:55:45 +0100
    Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D310174605A@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Spoiled Reward-Pathway Hypothesis
    Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 14:37:18 +0100
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain
    X-Filter-Info: UoS MailScan 0.1 [D 1]
    Sender: fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    >> I'm prepared to be laughed at here, but what about the Giant
    Panda?
    >> It's not exactly adapted for a bamboo only diet, isn't this
    addictive
    >> behaviour?

            <What inspired you to say this Vincent? To the best of my
    > knowledge, Panda's are highly adapted to eating bamboo; they have
    > suitably tough throats and stomachs to handle bamboo trunks and
    > splinters. Therefore I don't, in any way, find it possible to
    > conceive of this vital activity as damaging addictive behavior.
    > On the contrary.>
    >
            Well I'm probably wrong, but I thought that the Giant Panda's
    overall body design suggested an origin as a carnivore that developed a
    taste for bamboo that it is now tied to in a way that is leading to its
    extinction (bar human intervention to save it). That's what prompted me to
    suggest this.
    >
    >> One problem, I suppose, is how one might define addictive
    behaviour in
    >> animals in their natural environments, given that they largley
    >> do not have the "free" time as it were, to indulge behaviours
    >> as humans can thanks to our (in the developed parts of the
    >> world at any rate) having taken away the time spent gathering
    >> food etc. Surely the lab experiments demonstrate the
    >> principle that animals are capable of addictive behaviour
    >> given the "right" circumstances?

            <Allow me to present you with a definition cooked up by myself.
    > Addictive behavior: a type of behavior that gains dominance over
    > other behaviors to such an extent that the well-being or life-
    > expectancy of the relevant party is reduced.
    >
    > Corrolary: If the addictive behavior has overshadowed attention
    > to more beneficial or vital types of behaviors, it can be said
    > that the addictive behavior is damaging.>
    >
            That doesn't dispute the point that other animals are capable of
    behavioural addiction. Some might say that culture in an of itself is a
    behaviour addiction perculiar to (or most developed in) humans.

            <Drugs, sex, gambling, eating... when exercising these activities
    > to an addictive repetitive degree they all have a common
    > neurochemical denominator. That is, they affect
    > the brain in a similar way. So yes, gambling can truly be
    > addictive.>
    >
            Yes, perhaps. There does seem to be a strange gap though between
    the behaviour and induced physiological effect e.g. why does gambling
    trigger addictive behaviour in some but not others (whilst drug addiction,
    depending on the drug, I assume is a little more likely whatever the
    personality)? Perhaps it's something to do with the tuning of our
    risk-reward networks in our brains (making the assumption that there is such
    a thing, probably with a proper name...).

            Vincent

    -- 
    The University of Stirling is a university established in Scotland by
    charter at Stirling, FK9 4LA.  Privileged/Confidential Information may
    be contained in this message.  If you are not the addressee indicated
    in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such
    person), you may not disclose, copy or deliver this message to anyone
    and any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
    prohibited and may be unlawful.  In such case, you should destroy this
    message and kindly notify the sender by reply email.  Please advise
    immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email
    for messages of this kind.  Opinions, conclusions and other
    information in this message that do not relate to the official
    business of the University of Stirling shall be understood as neither
    given nor endorsed by it.
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 28 2001 - 15:05:37 BST