Re: Song of Myself

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Mon Aug 27 2001 - 04:55:51 BST

  • Next message: Vincent Campbell: "RE: Shaggy Dog vs. Psychic Dog"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id EAA07183 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk); Mon, 27 Aug 2001 04:51:40 +0100
    From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 22:55:51 -0500
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: Song of Myself
    Message-ID: <3B897E77.19583.A46D3B@localhost>
    In-reply-to: <F32tXsL1c00goZolmRB00012ace@hotmail.com>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
    Sender: fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On 26 Aug 2001, at 23:42, Scott Chase wrote:

    >
    >
    >
    >
    > >From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    > >Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > >To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    > >Subject: Re: Song of Myself
    > >Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2001 21:43:27 -0500
    > >
    > >On 26 Aug 2001, at 11:56, Dace wrote:
    > >
    > > > From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    > > >
    > > > > > Sheldrake is suggesting that the form of an organism somehow
    > > > > > stays with the present, even when its materialization has long
    > > > > > since vanished. This is simply a roundabout way of saying
    > > > > > that if memory is real, it's holistic, not particulate.
    > > > > >
    > > > > And this idea of an ethereal or astral memory, in the complete
    > > > > and utter absence of any site or mechanism for same, is itself
    > > > > an anthromorphization and a (very old) mystically driven error.
    > > > > Platonic Forms, 'somehow' hovering in the celestial spheres, to
    > > > > inform the mundane world, long after their dead carriers have
    > > > > dissolved away; it makes for okay greek literature, and even
    > > > > possesses a seductive touch of poesy, but scientific and
    > > > > empirically veridical, it is not.
    > > >
    > > > Platonic Forms don't evolve. They transcend time altogether.
    > > > Sheldrake criticizes Goodwin on the grounds that his "generative
    > > > equations" are unaffected by the emergence or extinction of the
    > > > species whose forms they describe.
    > > >
    > >Whether a species of starfish is dead or alive, five arms
    > >mathematically works best from a geometric stability point of view,
    > >just as five legs does for rolling chairs.
    > > >
    > > > In the morphic model, there's no
    > > > field until there's a species in resonance with its past. As the
    > > > species evolves, its form changes. Thus what it resonates with
    > > > also changes. Fields evolve right along with the organisms they
    > > > govern.
    > > >
    > >This would make the genetic evolutionary evolution of the organism
    > >causally responsible for the changes in such a field, rendering the
    > >very idea, much less the existence, of such a field Occamically
    > >superfluous. Why doncha borrow one of those groovy field detectors
    > >from the scientologists?
    > >
    > Didn't they "borrow" the skin galvanometer from Jung? He put it to
    > good use in his complex theory at least IIRC. Just like the engram was
    > yanked from Semon.
    >
    > [grumble, snort, chortle]
    >
    (snicker)
    >
    > These days neuroimaging technology [PET and fMRI] has replaced
    > archaic devices such as galvanometers as a means of studying mental
    > states.
    >
    And they're actually of some use; imag(in)e that!
    >
    > (snip)
    > >
    > > > The parts of a
    > > > machine are manufactured separately and then placed together. Its
    > > > form is imposed onto it, rather than arising intrinsically, and is
    > > > separable from the matter that comprises it.
    > > >
    > >That's because we build it. We also build genetically engineered
    > >living organisms. And your point is?
    > >
    > >
    > Have you personally taken part in building any genetically engineered
    > organisms? I haven't.
    >
    I personally haven't, but glowing monkeys and carotene-rich
    tomatoes HAVE been built, and by humans; I was employing 'we'
    in the homo sapiens sense.
    >
    > _________________________________________________________________ Get
    > your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 27 2001 - 04:56:22 BST