Re: Logic

From: Kenneth Van Oost (Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be)
Date: Tue Aug 21 2001 - 21:40:58 BST

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Re: Design"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id VAA24712 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 21 Aug 2001 21:00:38 +0100
    Message-ID: <008c01c12a81$b23eea60$6a9ebed4@default>
    From: "Kenneth Van Oost" <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
    To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    References: <3B805C93.28791.471365@localhost> <003901c12a6b$d77dd5e0$eb25f4d8@teddace>
    Subject: Re: Logic
    Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 22:40:58 +0200
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
    X-Priority: 3
    X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
    X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300
    X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300
    Sender: fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Hi all,

    Due to a lot of work I will answer any post in a proper way at a later date.
    Thanks for the understanding !
    This does not mean I will step back, I just don 't have the time right now
    to engage myself into a discussion at depth.
    I will be back, I hope with the weekend.
    I will keep track....

    Best

    Kenneth
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: Dace <edace@earthlink.net>
    > > Kenneth wrote:
    > > > Environmental selection was/is
    > > > acted upon us by external agencies, they influence(d) something. That
    > > > has always been the tricky part, isn 't it !? Influenced by what,
    > > > emotions, environmental constrains and restrains !? Selected by what
    > > > !? Pressures !? Which ones, Joe !? Emotions, constrains and restrains
    > > >
    > > Influenced by CONTIGUOUS (that's touching) environmental
    > > situations, ones that are obsevable, describable and measurable,
    > > not by some frigging woo-woo seance-master drawing-down-the-mo-
    > > -jo astral fantasy line.
    >
    > What's with this obsession with contiguous causation? Contact mechanics
    > disappeared from physics in the 19th century. There's no contact
    mechanics
    > in the orbits of the planets. There's no contact mechanics in the
    > transmission of signals across electromagnetic fields. What Sheldrake and
    > Goodwin are trying to do, in their different ways, is to bring biology up
    to
    > date with physics. Faraday was considered a nut until Maxwell came along
    > and proved his theory mathematically. Physics has already undergone the
    > painful transition to uncertainty and chaos. Unfortunately, biology has
    > been slower to adapt to the new, more demanding terrain.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 21 2001 - 21:05:10 BST