Re: Spoiled Reward-Pathway Hypothesis

From: Philip Jonkers (P.A.E.Jonkers@phys.rug.nl)
Date: Tue Aug 21 2001 - 13:04:12 BST

  • Next message: Chris Taylor: "Re: Spoiled Reward-Pathway Hypothesis"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id NAA23260 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 21 Aug 2001 13:06:20 +0100
    From: Philip Jonkers <P.A.E.Jonkers@phys.rug.nl>
    X-Authentication-Warning: rugth1.phys.rug.nl: www-data set sender to jonkers@localhost using -f
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Spoiled Reward-Pathway Hypothesis
    Message-ID: <998395452.3b824e3ce450b@rugth1.phys.rug.nl>
    Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 14:04:12 +0200 (CEST)
    References: <3B8055B5.8367.2C4117@localhost> <3B81CC5F.17306.7FA755@localhost> <3B823FC0.FA5C1329@bioinf.man.ac.uk>
    In-Reply-To: <3B823FC0.FA5C1329@bioinf.man.ac.uk>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
    User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.5
    X-Originating-IP: 129.125.13.3
    Sender: fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Quoting Chris Taylor <Christopher.Taylor@man.ac.uk>:

    > joedees@bellsouth.net wrote:
    > >
    > > On 20 Aug 2001, at 16:11, Philip Jonkers wrote:
    > >
    > > > Philip:
    > > > > > Natural selection ought to favor birds who aren't drunk
    > > > > an
    > > > > > entire season. I am well aware also that drugs (including
    > alcohol)
    > > > > are
    > > > > > not uncommon for usage in the animal kingdom. I cannot
    > imagine,
    > > > > > really, that natural selection would allow for animal
    > `druggies'
    > > > > > to emerge and maintain in the extremely competitive and
    > demanding
    > > > > natural
    > > > > > world.
    > > > Joe:
    > > > > It's a cost-benefit analysis; when fermented barries are the
    > only
    > > > > (or the major) source of food available, the collateral damage
    > some
    > > > > drunken birds do to themselves could be much less than the
    > massive
    > > > > die-off afflicting starving flocks. Of course, selection
    > pressures
    > > > > would progressively weed out those birds unable to handle their
    > > > > liquor, the ones who could handle it would live to reproduce,
    > and
    > > > > subsequent generations would find the equation more and more in
    > > > > favor of the berry-eating stoners.
    > > >
    > > > Hi Joe, thanks also for the feedback. Fair enough, natural
    > selection
    > > > seems to favor the sober animal and permits the occasional user.
    > So
    > > > much for the animal kingdom, I'm still left with humans who, I
    > think
    > > > it's safe to say, generally are susceptible to develop addiction
    > of
    > > > whatever kind. Can you account for this with arguments ignoring
    > human
    > > > culture?
    > > >
    > > We may feel a greater need to keep our bigger brains occupied.
    >
    > Lots of drugs make animals feel better about things (calmer, happier,
    > weirder etc.), but humans control their environment in a way no other
    > animal does. We have taken ourselves out of the 'red in tooth and
    > claw'-style selection, so we are released to tickle our own pleasure
    > centres because the risk side of the equation is diminished. Other
    > animals would if they could (and some do).
    >
    > Anyone got any good alcoholic lab rat stories?

    Again, I am well aware that animals may be made addicts too.
    In a controlled lab-environment that is.

    In the past I did some internet searching on animal drug use
    and this is what I came up with:

    1. "Homo Intoxicatus"
       http://www.findarticles.com/m1511/6_21/62277718/p1/article.jhtml

    2. http://unreasonable.org/essays/buzz.html

    3. "Drug Use In Nature and Prehistoric Times"
       http://www.homestead.com/addhxwebsite/introductione.html

    4. "Life in Pursuit of Artificial Paradise"
       http://www.hoboes.com/html/Politics/Prohibition/Notes/Intoxication.html

    5. "Wicked Butterflies"
       http://www.insectia.com/beta/e/ep_c203025.html

    6. "Evolutionary origins of alcoholism and addiction"
       http://www.indiaserver.com/thehindu/2000/10/26/stories/08260004.htm

    7. "Strange But True"
       http://cincinnati.com/freetime/strange/121098_strange.html

    8. "Health and Fitness: Counteracting the Side-Effects of Alcohol" (The
    Prohibition Times)
       http://sites.netscape.net/gostryter/prohibition/medical1.html

    9. "Long summer drought may explain squirrely fall in the Northeast"
       http://www.news.cornell.edu/science/Sept95/st.wilddrought.html

    10. "The Dope on Drugs: How the Most Popular Substances Affect Your Brain,
        Body and Behavior"
       http://cgi1.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/WPlate/2000-01/12/022l-011200-idx.html

    I acknowledge we humans have succeeded in creating an
    environment (culture) which tolerates and supports (extensive)
    addictive behavior. Through posing my hypothesis, I was
    wondering whether or not it is precisely our culture which
    has fed emergence of addictive behavior by evolving our
    brain correspondingly. Maybe this is reflected in the
    relative size of our reward-pathway being larger than that
    of other animals (primates, in particular, make fine comparison
    material). Or perhaps our brain releases more dopamine or
    has higher functional dopamine levels than other animals.

    Philip.
     

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 21 2001 - 13:10:50 BST