Re: Spoiled Reward-Pathway Hypothesis

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Tue Aug 21 2001 - 08:50:07 BST

  • Next message: Chris Taylor: "Re: engrams"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id JAA22705 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk); Tue, 21 Aug 2001 09:33:25 +0100
    From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 02:50:07 -0500
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: Spoiled Reward-Pathway Hypothesis
    Message-ID: <3B81CC5F.17306.7FA755@localhost>
    In-reply-to: <998316678.3b811a8651f8b@rugth1.phys.rug.nl>
    References: <3B8055B5.8367.2C4117@localhost>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
    Sender: fmb-bounces@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On 20 Aug 2001, at 16:11, Philip Jonkers wrote:

    > Philip:
    > > > Natural selection ought to favor birds who aren't drunk
    > > an
    > > > entire season. I am well aware also that drugs (including alcohol)
    > > are
    > > > not uncommon for usage in the animal kingdom. I cannot imagine,
    > > > really, that natural selection would allow for animal `druggies'
    > > > to emerge and maintain in the extremely competitive and demanding
    > > natural
    > > > world.
    > Joe:
    > > It's a cost-benefit analysis; when fermented barries are the only
    > > (or the major) source of food available, the collateral damage some
    > > drunken birds do to themselves could be much less than the massive
    > > die-off afflicting starving flocks. Of course, selection pressures
    > > would progressively weed out those birds unable to handle their
    > > liquor, the ones who could handle it would live to reproduce, and
    > > subsequent generations would find the equation more and more in
    > > favor of the berry-eating stoners.
    >
    > Hi Joe, thanks also for the feedback. Fair enough, natural selection
    > seems to favor the sober animal and permits the occasional user. So
    > much for the animal kingdom, I'm still left with humans who, I think
    > it's safe to say, generally are susceptible to develop addiction of
    > whatever kind. Can you account for this with arguments ignoring human
    > culture?
    >
    We may feel a greater need to keep our bigger brains occupied.
    >
    > Philip.
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Aug 21 2001 - 09:42:56 BST