RE: Logic

From: Vincent Campbell (v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk)
Date: Fri Aug 17 2001 - 11:00:30 BST

  • Next message: Philip Jonkers: "RE: Gene-Meme Co-evolution in Reverse?"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id LAA12415 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 17 Aug 2001 11:29:06 +0100
    Message-ID: <2D1C159B783DD211808A006008062D3101746014@inchna.stir.ac.uk>
    From: Vincent Campbell <v.p.campbell@stir.ac.uk>
    To: "'memetics@mmu.ac.uk'" <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    Subject: RE: Logic
    Date: Fri, 17 Aug 2001 11:00:30 +0100
    X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21)
    Content-Type: text/plain
    X-Filter-Info: UoS MailScan 0.1 [D 1]
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

            <In the physicalist model, memes must be transmitted to us
    externally from
    > other people. But memetics has always been more than just imitation.
    > Memes
    > spring up from within. If you're at a football game, and the home team
    > scores, when you rise to your feet, it's not because you feel like you
    > really
    > ought to do what everyone else is doing. It's because you're on the same
    > "wavelength" with the rest of the crowd. The meme in your head is simply
    > the particle aspect of the cultural morphic field embracing all the fans
    > in
    > the stadium.>
    >
            What if it's the opposing team that scores? This is a spurious
    example that again needs no mad MR idea to explain it. Crowd behaviours,
    social psychology, not to mention individual emotional engagement with
    whatever sport is being played all feature in such behaviour.

            <Memes commonly spread without any possible mode of physical
    transmission.>

            Well, this is one wing of the memetics community, but some argue
    that memes can_only_ transmit in physical forms, cultural artefacts
    (including things like, ooh... e-mails?).

            <For instance, not only agriculture but similar building designs
    appeared
    > independently in several locations around the earth.>
    >
            At very different times. One of the basic problems with the
    pyramids, instance is that Egyptian and Mayan pyramids emerged centuries
    apart (not to mention that they served completely different purposes- tombs
    for the former, and temples for the latter). And how come lots of other
    peoples around the world didn't start building pyramids? (never seen in
    Europe, or south of the Nubian versions in Africa, or in Asia etc.).

    > Morphogenic fields and resonance are just not needed in any way to
    > explain these kinds of things.
    >
            Vincent

    -- 
    The University of Stirling is a university established in Scotland by
    charter at Stirling, FK9 4LA.  Privileged/Confidential Information may
    be contained in this message.  If you are not the addressee indicated
    in this message (or responsible for delivery of the message to such
    person), you may not disclose, copy or deliver this message to anyone
    and any action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on it, is
    prohibited and may be unlawful.  In such case, you should destroy this
    message and kindly notify the sender by reply email.  Please advise
    immediately if you or your employer do not consent to Internet email
    for messages of this kind.  Opinions, conclusions and other
    information in this message that do not relate to the official
    business of the University of Stirling shall be understood as neither
    given nor endorsed by it.
    

    =============================================================== This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing) see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 17 2001 - 11:33:31 BST