Re: Callouses and Kings

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Fri Aug 17 2001 - 00:00:36 BST

  • Next message: Dace: "Re: Callouses and Kings"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id XAA10954 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 16 Aug 2001 23:56:28 +0100
    From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 18:00:36 -0500
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: Callouses and Kings
    Message-ID: <3B7C0A44.14821.3037E3@localhost>
    In-reply-to: <000b01c12683$f9065e80$a207bed4@default>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On 16 Aug 2001, at 20:47, Kenneth Van Oost wrote:

    >
    > ----- Original Message -----
    > From: Kenneth Van Oost <Kenneth.Van.Oost@village.uunet.be>
    > To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    > Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 11:14 AM
    > Subject: Re: Callouses and Kings
    >
    >
    > >
    > > ----- Original Message -----
    > > From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    > > To: <memetics@mmu.ac.uk>
    > >
    > > > Callouses would not evolve all of a piece, but gradually; but what
    > > > you're REALLY missing here is dermatological understanding.
    > > > Animals (including us) can develop callouses anywhere there is
    > > > chafing on the skin; it's built into the dermis; the only
    > > > modification needed is one that permits such growth in the absence
    > > > of stimulation, and that mutation could happen anywhere, and only
    > > > stick where it was useful and selected for.
    > >
    > > Just a few minor observations,
    > >
    > > << I just wonder how slow such a selection process works !!
    > > I mean, if one variation permits an organism to substain the
    > > hazzards of its life better, wouldn 't it be logical to presume that
    > > such a
    > variation
    > > were selected much faster and get passed down to the offspring far
    > > more easier !?
    >
    Of course it is selected for if it allows the carrier to live and
    reproduce; that is trivially and tautologically how selection works.
    The point is that environmental success isn't what gets things
    selected FASTER, it's what gets them selected AT ALL.
    >
    >Why waiting for a million years or more !? It seems
    > > very unlikely to me that Nature would create, so to speak, an animal
    > > and than realise, damn I forgot the kneecaps ! Well, no problema, I
    > > ' ve got time and wait another million years !?
    > >
    Of course some mutations aren't environmentally sustainable; they
    simply die out, which is how eviltion can be blind and yet still work.
    The "damn, I forgot" line is an unjustifiable anthropomorphism of a
    natural process.
    >
    > > And a gradually evolution sounds to me like calluses had to fight
    > > for their rightful place. And why, have we, as humans, still
    > > calluses on our feet and no longer on our hands if supposingly we
    > > walked this earth on all fours for a million years !? Why is Nature
    > > slow with the camel and ' fast ' with us !? Why does this system
    > > works gradual faster in dismissing a variation than in creating one
    > > !? Or, in the case of the calluses on our hands which disappeared,
    > > would the more faster memetic evolution count for the beginning of
    > > the
    > dismissing
    > > of that variation !?
    >
    We've been off all fours for at least 2 million years; that's not real
    lightning fast. Still, we have more callouses on our hands that we
    have on, say, our armpits or thighs, and a little hard manual labor
    will stimulate the growth of hand callouses in pretty short order (a
    lot quicker than hard pubic labor will cause sex workers to develop
    callouses there, I'll wager).
    >
    > > Best,
    > >
    > > Kenneth
    > >
    > > ( I am, because we are) no elephants
    > >
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 17 2001 - 00:00:51 BST