Re: Logic + universal evolution

From: joedees@bellsouth.net
Date: Fri Aug 10 2001 - 21:47:00 BST

  • Next message: Aaron Lynch: "The Evolution of Intelligence (new book)"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id VAA14409 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Fri, 10 Aug 2001 21:43:04 +0100
    From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2001 15:47:00 -0500
    Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
    Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
    Subject: Re: Logic + universal evolution
    Message-ID: <3B7401F4.29588.1201585@localhost>
    In-reply-to: <004a01c121cb$97351280$da86b2d1@teddace>
    X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.12c)
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    On 10 Aug 2001, at 11:38, Dace wrote:

    > From: <joedees@bellsouth.net>
    >
    > > > To my knowledge Wilson has never responded to Sheldrake's thesis
    > > > that termite mounds are governed by morphic fields, with the
    > > > termites occupying a similar role to cells within animal bodies.
    > > > Wilson has never responded to this suggestion because he has no
    > > > alternative. It's just up in the air. He doesn't like the field
    > > > explanation, but he can't offer anything better.
    > > >
    > > > Here's a quote from The Social Insects (1971):
    > > >
    > > > "It is all but impossible to conceive how one colony member can
    > > > oversee more than a minute fraction of the work or envision in its
    > > > entirety the plan of such a finished product. Some of these nests
    > > > require many worker lifetimes to complete, and each new addition
    > > > must somehow be brought into a proper relaitonship with the
    > > > previous parts.
    > > > The existence of such nests leads inevitably to the conclusion
    > > > that
    > > > the workers interact in a very orderly and predictable manner.
    > > > But how can the workers communicate so effictively over such long
    > > > period time? Also, who has the blueprint of the nest?"
    > > >
    > > > It's just like in the body. There seems to be no reason why
    > > > everything works the way it does. We just assume there must be a
    > > > control mechanism somewhere in there, which is based on a
    > > > blueprint of some kind. So where are the chromosomes of termite
    > > > mounds? And if termite mounds don't need a design of some kind
    > > > buried deep within it, then how can we simply *assume* that the
    > > > body requires any such thing?
    > > > The regular forms of these mounds is a perplexing question for
    > > > which
    > > > there's no answer outside of field theory, whether the static,
    > > > mathematical idealism of Goodwin or the evolutionary, memory-based
    > > > model of Sheldrake.
    > > >
    > > Simple rules can have complex consequences. The apparently
    > > choreographed movements of schools of fish or flocks of birds are
    > > explained by each individual bird's tendency to keep its neighbor
    > > within X and Y distance of itself;
    >
    > Obviously. The question is how the birds manage to maintain the right
    > distance, particularly when the whole flock turns on a dime. Either
    > the brain is running an incredbly elaborate motion program or the
    > flock is a morphic field in which the birds are "particles." While
    > the latter possibility might strike you as being "weird," the former
    > possibility would require neural computing processes unimaginably more
    > powerful and rapid than anything humans have ever devised.
    >
    No, just rapid reaction time, and the reaction times of birds, like
    their heartbeats, are a lot faster than ours, crerating the illusion
    that they are all changing direction at the same time when actually
    there is a small reaction time involved.
    >
    > > the building of beaver dams is
    > > explained by the rule that branches and mud are to be moved
    > > towards the sound of running water. I'm sure that there is a
    > > similar rule or small group of rules, probably connected with
    > > pheromonic chemical marking, that will suffice to explain termite
    > > mound construction.
    >
    > But of course.
    >
    > > > Ted
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    > > >
    >
    >
    > ===============================================================
    > This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    > Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    > For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    > see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
    >

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Aug 10 2001 - 22:06:35 BST