Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id XAA11588 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 9 Aug 2001 23:45:02 +0100 Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2001 15:42:45 -0700 From: Bill Spight <bspight@pacbell.net> Subject: Re: MR Evidence To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk Message-id: <3B7311E5.93A2EFF2@pacbell.net> Organization: Saybrook Graduate School X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en]C-CCK-MCD {Yahoo;YIP052400} (Win95; U) Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT X-Accept-Language: en References: <3B6ECBC0.14995.5A4B18@localhost> <002101c11f77$62cc25c0$f188b2d1@teddace> <3B7058C1.B3F322CD@pacbell.net> <001901c1203e$ac167a60$6787b2d1@teddace> <3B71F207.5402430A@pacbell.net> <004401c1210c$03aa4860$1e24f4d8@teddace> Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk Precedence: bulk Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
Dear Ted,
> > Who knows what the feeling of confidence about guesses means? Even if
> > you assume morphic resonance, why should you predict that?
>
> Because the real terms seem somehow familiar to us, so when we guess their
> meaning, we're liable to feel more confident of being right.
>
Oh? And what evidence do we have for that? And if that is the
explanation, why not have the words rated for familiarity?
> > The second experiment is a good start. Once you have a set of fake
> > Persian words that are as easy to duplicate as a set of real Persian
> > words, then you test whether the real words are easier to learn. They
> > should be, by morphic resonance, right?
>
> This is exactly what Pickering did.
>
Err, not as reported. He only investigated ease of duplication, he
didn't control for it.
Ciao,
Bill
===============================================================
This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 09 2001 - 23:49:19 BST