Re: Logic + universal evolution

From: Philip Jonkers (P.A.E.Jonkers@phys.rug.nl)
Date: Thu Aug 09 2001 - 11:33:25 BST

  • Next message: Wade T.Smith: "Re: Logic + universal evolution"

    Received: by alpheratz.cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk id LAA09916 (8.6.9/5.3[ref pg@gmsl.co.uk] for cpm.aca.mmu.ac.uk from fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk); Thu, 9 Aug 2001 11:35:36 +0100
    From: Philip Jonkers <P.A.E.Jonkers@phys.rug.nl>
    X-Authentication-Warning: rugth1.phys.rug.nl: www-data set sender to jonkers@localhost using -f
    To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    Subject: Re: Logic + universal evolution
    Message-ID: <997353205.3b7266f5769a7@rugth1.phys.rug.nl>
    Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2001 12:33:25 +0200 (CEST)
    References: <20010807174807.AAA23176@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]>
    In-Reply-To: <20010807174807.AAA23176@camailp.harvard.edu@[128.103.125.215]>
    Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
    Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
    User-Agent: IMP/PHP IMAP webmail program 2.2.5
    X-Originating-IP: 62.100.20.185
    Sender: fmb-majordomo@mmu.ac.uk
    Precedence: bulk
    Reply-To: memetics@mmu.ac.uk
    

    Quoting "Wade T.Smith" <wade_smith@harvard.edu>:

    > On 08/07/01 13:05, Philip Jonkers said this-
    >
    > >Well, the evolutionary generation of particles just prior to the
    > >big-bang instant I sketched just above.
    >
    > I'm not a cosmologist, although I'd want to be one in another life if I
    > had the time to use one up, but, hey, there weren't nuthin' before the
    > big bang. And the particles what are here are a result of the
    > _deconstruction_ of the energy _afterwards_, not any sort of replication
    > of particles, but a breaking up of more cohesive, energetic, forms.

    How can you be so sure Wade that what you claim is true? I admit my story to be
    speculative, but yours has to be too, for obvious reasons. In fact, all
    scenarios about the origin of our universe necessarily have to be speculative
    since witnesses were absent. I may have missed something crucial over here.
    Therefore, do you have access to solid arguments refuting the idea of
    the evolutionary process yielding the emergence of stable particles
    (proton,electrons, neutrons) immediately prior to the big bang instant?

    Philip.

    ===============================================================
    This was distributed via the memetics list associated with the
    Journal of Memetics - Evolutionary Models of Information Transmission
    For information about the journal and the list (e.g. unsubscribing)
    see: http://www.cpm.mmu.ac.uk/jom-emit



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 09 2001 - 11:39:53 BST